Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
Published on: February 11, 2014
Near prescribing trends in two low vision rehabilitation clinics over a ten-year period
Tracy L Matchinski1, Kara E Crumbliss2, Elise Corgiat2
1Rosenbloom Center on Vision and Aging, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clinical Relevance:
Optical magnification (OM), electronic magnification (EM), and assistive technology (AT) can be prescribed in low vision rehabilitation (LVR) clinics for near vision goals of patients. This study shows the prescription of OM has not decreased with increased availability of EM and AT.
Background:
Near visual goals are a primary concern for patients with visual impairment. LVR providers can prescribe OM, EM and/or AT to help. With the rapid evolution and availability of EM and AT, we aim to evaluate if there have been changes in the prescription patterns of clinicians with respect to OM over time. We hypothesise that the increased availability of technology may result in declining prescriptions of OM and increasing prescription of EM and AT over time.
Methods:
This retrospective study investigated near prescribing between 2008-2017 for 530 new patients to the LVR clinics. Examinations were performed by optometrists specialising in low vision. Near devices prescribed included OM and EM and AT.
Results:
Most patients attending the LVR clinics were female, over 60 years old and had age related macular degeneration. Near visual goals were a primary concern of 97.2% of the patients. OM was most prescribed in the 0-19 and >60-year-old age groups. Within the 20-39-year-old age group there was the greatest number of both EM and AT prescriptions. OM was most prescribed in patients with visual acuity better than 6/60. EM and AT showed a trend of increasing prescription as visual acuity decreased. EM prescription peaked in <6/60 to 6/240 category while AT trended upwards from <6/21 to no light perception and peaked in patients with no light perception. Referral rates for additional rehabilitation services were 75.7%.
Conclusions:
This study shows that the prescription of OM is not declining even as the prescription and the breadth of electronic magnification and assistive technology available is expanding. OM continues to be a viable option for patients, especially in the youngest and oldest cohorts.
More Related Videos
06:19Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Glaucoma: Overview
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways