Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
The validation of left atrial strain imaging for the assessment of diastolic functions in patients with ST-segment
Eser Durmaz1, Mehmet Hakan Karpuz2, Baris İkitimur2
1Department of Cardiology, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Kocamustafapasa Street, Fatih, Istanbul, 34098, Turkey. durmazeser@hotmail.com.
Insights
Left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) imaging shows promise for assessing left ventricular filling pressure in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). This method offers a more comprehensive evaluation than current echocardiographic parameters.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Myocardial Infarction Research
Background:
- Accurate assessment of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is critical for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.
- Current echocardiographic methods for LVFP assessment in STEMI patients have limitations.
- Novel imaging techniques are needed for comprehensive LVFP evaluation in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical utility of left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) imaging.
- To assess LARS as a tool for evaluating left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).
- To compare LARS with invasive left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) measurements.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 69 STEMI patients successfully treated with pPCI.
- Invasive left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) measurement post-pPCI.
- Left atrial strain (LARS) imaging performed within 24 hours post-pPCI; normal LARS defined as >23%.
Main Results:
- Patients with LARS < 23% (Group 1) had significantly higher Troponin and pro-BNP levels compared to Group 2 (LARS > 23%).
- Group 1 exhibited higher left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain and lower ejection fraction (LVEF).
- Estimated mean LVFP was significantly higher in Group 1 (p=0.003), with a moderate inverse correlation found between LARS and LVEDP (r=-0.300).
Conclusions:
- Left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) imaging is a potential non-invasive tool for assessing left atrial pressure.
- LARS provides valuable insights into LVFP in STEMI patients post-pPCI.
- Further research is warranted to validate LARS as a standard clinical assessment method.
Abstract:
Assessment of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is crucial in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Since current guideline recommended echocardiographic parameters have limited value, more comprehensive assessment methods are required in this patient subset.In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical utility of left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) imaging in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Patients who underwent successful pPCI were included. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was measured invasively following pPCI. Left atrial strain imaging was performed following pPCI within 24 h of pPCI. Normal LARS value was accepted as above 23%. We prospectively enrolled 69 patients; there were 18 patients with LARS below 23% who were included into group 1 and rest of the study population included into group 2. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of comorbidities.Troponin and pro-BNP levels were significantly higher in group 1 (p: 0.036 and 0.047 respectively). Left atrial volume and tricuspid regurgitation velocity were similar between groups (p: 0.416 and p: 0.351 respectively). Septal tissue velocity was higher (p: 0.001) and Septal E/e' ratio was lower (p: 0.004) in group 2. Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain value was higher in group 1 which is consistent with observed lower ejection (LVEF) fraction in group 1 (p: 0.001 for LV strain and p: 0.001 for LVEF). Estimated mean LVFP was also higher in group 1 (p: 0.003).Correlation analyses revealed moderate correlation between LARS and LVEDP (r: - 0.300). Our results indicate that left atrial strain imaging is a promising tool for the assessment of left atrial pressure in patients with STEMI.
More Related Videos
07:21Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests