Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

534
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
534

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and Validation of Modified Basic English Lexicon Sentences for Use With a Pediatric Population.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Polarity sensitivity to symmetric, biphasic monopolar pulses is not a reliable indicator of peripheral axonal degeneration in human cochlear implant users.

Frontiers in audiology and otology·2026
Same author

Electrically evoked compound action potentials in adult and pediatric cochlear implant users: II. Assessing cochlear nerve health status with the interphase gap effect and the phase locking value.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Estimating Small Area Statistics and Developing a Novel Mapping Tool to Display Them Using a User-Centered Design Process.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2026
Same author

Sensitivity to interaural phase as a function of frequency: Age effects measured with behavioral and electrophysiological tasks.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

The Interphase Gap Effect in Cochlear Implant Users: Biological Basis, Parameter Selection, Analytical Methods, and Quantitative Scales.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same journal

Interaction of near-wall bubble arrays with acoustic waves induced by an oscillating rigid wall.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Ultra-broadband underwater acoustic projector based on transverse resonance orthogonal beam (TROB) mode and acoustic matching layer technique.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Fine-scale quantitative analysis of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) song shows varying stability of song types.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.5K

Predicting speech-in-speech recognition: Short-term audibility and spatial separation.

Peter A Wasiuk1, Lauren Calandruccio2, Jacob J Oleson3

  • 1Department of Communication Disorders, 493 Fitch Street, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, Connecticut 06515, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|September 20, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial separation improves speech-in-speech recognition by enhancing audible glimpses, even at fixed signal-to-noise ratios. This finding is crucial for understanding auditory perception in complex listening environments.

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

472
P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

613

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.5K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

472
P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
06:09

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation

Published on: September 8, 2023

613

Area of Science:

  • Auditory science
  • Speech perception
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Variability in speech-in-speech recognition is a key challenge.
  • Energetic and informational masking (IM) influence recognition, but IM is hard to quantify with dynamic maskers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how short-term audibility and spatial separation affect speech recognition in two-talker masking.
  • To quantify the impact of spatial cues on informational masking.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty young adults with normal hearing (NH) performed sentence recognition tasks.
  • Speech reception thresholds and keyword recognition were measured under varying spatial conditions.
  • A glimpsing model quantified short-term audibility for keywords.

Main Results:

  • Speech recognition correlated with the proportion of audible keyword glimpses, irrespective of overall signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • Greater short-term audibility was needed for colocated speech compared to spatially separated speech.
  • Spatial separation enhanced the benefit of increased target audibility on keyword recognition.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial cues improve the efficiency of glimpsing in competing speech for individuals with normal hearing.
  • The study provides a quantitative framework for estimating informational masking in different spatial configurations.