Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Dissection of Enhancer Function Using Multiplex CRISPR-based Enhancer Interference in Cell Lines
Published on: June 2, 2018
Three-Dimensional Chromosomal Landscape Revealing miR-146a Dysfunctional Enhancer in Lupus and Establishing a
Xinyi Zhu1, Yutong Zhang2, Zihang Yin3
1Shanghai Institute of Rheumatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China and Shenzhen Futian Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Shenzhen, China.
Objective:
The diminished expression of microRNA-146a (miR-146a) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) contributes to the aberrant activation of the interferon pathway. Despite its significance, the underlying mechanism driving this reduced expression remains elusive. Considering the integral role of enhancers in steering gene expression, our study seeks to pinpoint the SLE-affected enhancers responsible for modulating miR-146a expression. Additionally, we aim to elucidate the mechanisms by which these enhancers influence the contribution of miR-146a to the activation of the interferon pathway.
Methods:
Circular chromosome conformation capture sequencing and epigenomic profiles were applied to identify candidate enhancers of miR-146a. CRISPR activation was performed to screen functional enhancers. Differential analysis of chromatin accessibility was used to identify SLE-dysregulated enhancers, and the mechanism underlying enhancer dysfunction was investigated by analyzing transcription factor binding. The therapeutic value of a lupus-related enhancer was further evaluated by targeting it in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with SLE through a CRISPR activation approach.
Results:
We identified shared and cell-specific enhancers of miR-146a in distinct immune cells. An enhancer 32.5 kb downstream of miR-146a possesses less accessibility in SLE, and its chromatin openness was negatively correlated with SLE disease activity. Moreover, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α, a down-regulated transcription factor in patients with SLE, binds to the 32.5-kb enhancer and induces the epigenomic change of this locus. Furthermore, CRISPR-based activation of this enhancer in SLE PBMCs could inhibit the activity of interferon pathway.
Conclusion:
Our work defines a promising target for SLE intervention. We adopted integrative approaches to define cell-specific and functional enhancers of the SLE critical gene and investigated the mechanism underlying its dysregulation mediated by a lupus-related enhancer.
More Related Videos
11:06Genome-wide Analysis of HDAC Inhibitor-mediated Modulation of microRNAs and mRNAs in B Cells Induced to Undergo Class-switch DNA Recombination and Plasma Cell Differentiation
Published on: September 20, 2017
07:23Dual CRISPR-Interference Strategy for Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions Between Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer Cells
Published on: May 30, 2025