Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children
Published on: August 19, 2020
A guide to evaluating systematic reviews for the busy clinicians or reluctant readers
Stanley Innes1, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde2
1Adult Mental Health and Wellbeing, Eastern Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Stanley.Innes@easternhealth.org.au.
Abstract:
Systematic reviews (SRs) provide a solution to handle information overload for busy clinicians by summarising and synthesizing studies on a specific issue. However, because SRs are complicated and often boring to read, the busy or reluctant reader may make do with the abstract. When, as it has been shown, many authors overstate efficacy or understate harm in their abstracts, not consulting the underlying article could be misleading. This means that the prudent reader must have the ability to identify the 'tender points' of SRs to avoid falling for 'spin'. To this end we briefly review the method of SRs and ways to relatively quickly determine trustworthiness.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Health Literacy
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

