Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management01:26

Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management

96
Patients with esophageal strictures often experience a range of symptoms. Initially, they may have difficulty swallowing solid foods, which can progress to include liquids. Additional symptoms may involve chest pain or discomfort, regurgitating food and fluids, heartburn, unintentional weight loss, coughing or choking during meals, and hoarseness.
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
96
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

125
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
125
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction01:24

Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction

169
Esophageal varices are dilated, tortuous veins which are found mainly in the submucosa of the lower esophagus but which may also appear higher up or extend into the stomach. They develop due to increased pressure in the portal venous system, often as a result of liver cirrhosis. This condition scars and damages the liver, impeding normal blood flow through the portal vein. To compensate, blood seeks alternative pathways, forming fragile new vessels (varices) in the esophagus and stomach. These...
169
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction01:30

Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction

127
Esophageal strictures involve abnormal narrowing or tightening of the esophagus. They vary in length and severity, ranging from mild constriction to complete obstruction, and are classified as benign (noncancerous) or malignant (cancerous).
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
127
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management01:28

Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management

86
Esophageal varices often manifest as gastrointestinal bleeding episodes, presenting symptoms like hematemesis (vomiting of blood), hematochezia (passing fresh blood via the rectum), and melena (black, tarry stools). Other signs can include weight loss, anorexia, abdominal discomfort, jaundice, pruritus, altered mental status, and muscle cramps.
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
86
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

106
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
106

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immunogenomic landscape of the T cell repertoire after human lung transplantation and its clinical relevance.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2026
Same author

Being Artificially Intelligent.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
Same author

Longitudinal profiling of γδ T cell dynamics after human lung transplantation links donor and recipient subsets to clinical outcomes.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Outcomes after repair of enterocutaneous fistulas at a specialized center.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2026
Same author

Being a Colorectal Psychologist.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
Same author

A prediction model for disease-free survival following R0/R1 rectal cancer resection: A retrospective longitudinal study based on the Norwegian and Danish colorectal cancer quality registries.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

13.5K

Colonic interposition in esophagectomy: an ACS-NSQIP study.

Beatrix Hyemin Choi1, James Church2, Joshua Sonett3

  • 1Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, 161 Ft. Washington Avenue, Floor 8, New York, NY, 10032, USA. hmc2164@cumc.columbia.edu.

Surgical Endoscopy
|September 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Gastric pull-up (GPU) and colonic interposition (CI) are esophagectomy reconstruction methods. While CI had higher reoperation rates, patient frailty, not the procedure itself, likely explains outcome differences.

Keywords:
Colonic interpositionEsophagectomyNSQIP

More Related Videos

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
05:57

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Published on: February 10, 2017

8.5K
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

512

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

13.5K
ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
05:57

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Published on: February 10, 2017

8.5K
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

512

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Databases

Background:

  • Esophagectomy with gastric pull-up (GPU) or colonic interposition (CI) reconstructs the esophagus after cancer or injury.
  • Both procedures aim to restore function but are linked to significant patient morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare outcomes between gastric pull-up (GPU) and colonic interposition (CI) for esophageal reconstruction.
  • To identify factors influencing reoperation, readmission, and mortality in these procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.
  • Inclusion of patients undergoing GPU or CI between 2006 and 2020.
  • Statistical analysis including univariate and multivariate logistic regression to assess outcomes.

Main Results:

  • 12,545 GPU and 502 CI patients were analyzed.
  • Colonic interposition (CI) was associated with longer hospital stays and higher reoperation rates (23.9% vs. 14.5%).
  • Multivariate analysis indicated CI increased reoperation risk, but not readmission or mortality, suggesting patient frailty as a key factor.

Conclusions:

  • Colonic interposition (CI) is a viable option when gastric reconstruction is not feasible.
  • Observed outcome disparities are likely attributable to patient comorbidities and frailty rather than the inherent risks of CI.
  • Further research into patient selection and risk stratification for esophageal reconstruction is warranted.