Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Comparative Evaluation of Intracanal Smear Layer Removal by Different Root Canal Irrigants: A Scanning Electron
S Sudhakar1, Nidhi Gupta1, Natasha Ghambir1
1Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Santosh Dental College, Santosh (Deemed to be University), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Aim:
The purpose of the study is to compare and evaluate the efficacy of different root canal irrigants-100, 75, 50, and 25% neem extract, 100, 75, 50, and 25% apple cider vinegar (ACV), a combination of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and saline on smear layer removal using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
Materials And Methods:
A total of 80 freshly extracted single-rooted teeth were collected and divided into 10 groups-group I: normal saline (negative control), group II: NaOCl with EDTA (positive control), group III: 100% neem extract, group IV: 75% neem extract, group V: 50% neem extract, group VI: 25% neem extract, group VII: 100% ACV, group VIII: 75% ACV, group IX: 50% ACV, and group X: 25% ACV. The samples were irrigated with a specific group of irrigants, then split in a longitudinal axis and processed for analysis in an SEM. Microphotographs were obtained and scored according to Torabinejad et al.
Results:
Microphotographs were assessed and showed that 100% neem extract was similar to NaOCl with EDTA, followed by 75% neem extract and 100% ACV.
Conclusion:
This study showed that 100% neem extract removed the smear layer, similar to the NaOCl with EDTA.
How To Cite This Article:
Sudhakar S, Gupta N, Ghambir N, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Intracanal Smear Layer Removal by Different Root Canal Irrigants: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):633-638.
