Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks
Published on: December 2, 2015
Motivation-related influences on fNIRS signals during walking exercise: a permutation entropy approach
Sarah M Schwab1, Dalton Cooper2, Nicole S Carver2
1Department of Rehabilitation, Exercise, & Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. schwabsr@ucmail.uc.edu.
Abstract:
Cortical activity is typically indexed by analyzing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals in terms of the mean (e.g., mean oxygenated hemoglobin; HbO). Entropy approaches have been proposed as useful complementary methods for analyzing fNIRS signals. Entropy methods consider the regularity of a time series, and in doing so, may provide additional insights into the underlying dynamics of brain activity. Recent research using fNIRS found that non-disabled adults exhibit widespread increases in cortical activity and walk faster when under "extra motivation" conditions (e.g., verbal encouragement, lap timer) compared to trials without such motivators ("standard motivation"). This ancillary analysis of that study aimed to assess the extent to which fNIRS permutation entropy (PE) was affected by motivational conditions and explained variance in self-reported motivation. No regional PE differences were found between different motivational conditions. However, a greater difference in PE between motivational conditions (higher in standard, lower in extra motivation) in the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC) was associated with greater self-determined motivation. PE was also higher (less regular) in the primary sensorimotor cortex lower limb area compared to all other cortical areas analyzed, except the dorsal premotor cortex, regardless of motivational condition. This study provides early evidence to suggest that while different motivational environments during walking activity influence the magnitude of fNIRS signals, they may not influence the regularity of cortical signals. However, the magnitude of PE difference between motivational conditions was related to self-determined motivation in the aPFC, and this is an area warranting further investigation.
More Related Videos
05:25Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS
Published on: June 7, 2024
11:31Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy of the Sensory and Motor Brain Regions with Simultaneous Kinematic and EMG Monitoring During Motor Tasks
Published on: December 5, 2014