Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis
Jason Craft1, Yulee Li2, Niloofar Fouladi Nashta3
1DeMatteis Cardiovascular Institute, St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center, 100 Port Washington Blvd, Roslyn, NY, 11576, USA. Jason.Craft@chsli.org.
Compressed sensing cardiac MRI (CMR) accurately quantifies left ventricular (LV) function. While minor differences in LV mass and volume exist compared to conventional cine, compressed sensing significantly reduces scan times.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Physics
- Radiology
Background:
- Accelerated compressed sensing cine allows for single breath-hold ventricular function quantification.
- Conventional segmented breath-hold techniques may lead to LV volume under- or overestimation.
- Heterogeneous techniques complicate comparisons of LV parameters.
Conclusions:
- Compressed sensing (CS) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides accurate LV volume and mass assessment compared to conventional parallel imaging cine.
- CS techniques offer significant reductions in scan time.
- Despite minor quantitative differences, CS is a reliable method for LV assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

