Related Experiment Videos

Mechanical failure of the Björk-Shiley valve. Incidence, clinical presentation, and management

Insights

Mechanical failure occurred in 19 Björk-Shiley valves, primarily the convexo-concave type. The 70-degree convexo-concave mitral valve showed the highest failure incidence, with rapid circulatory collapse following aortic valve failure.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Mechanical Engineering

Background:

  • The Björk-Shiley mechanical heart valve has been widely implanted.
  • Understanding the long-term mechanical failure rates is crucial for patient management and device development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the mechanical failure experience of 3,334 Björk-Shiley valves implanted over 15 years.
  • To identify specific valve types and configurations associated with higher mechanical failure risks.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 3,334 implanted Björk-Shiley valves with a 99.2% follow-up.
  • Documentation of mechanical failures through autopsy (75% of fatalities) and clinical records.
  • Actuarial analysis of mechanical failure incidence based on valve type and opening angle.

Main Results:

  • Overall, 19 mechanical failures were documented; no failures occurred in standard Delrin, standard Pyrolyte aortic, or Monostrut valves.
  • One standard Pyrolyte mitral valve fractured. Among 1,461 convexo-concave valves, 18 fractured (6/884 with 60-degree angle, 12/577 with 70-degree angle).
  • The 5-year actuarial incidence of mechanical failure was 0.6% for the 60-degree convexo-concave valve and 2.8% for the 70-degree valve (p<0.01). Specific high-risk groups included 23mm aortic 60-degree (2.2% at 5 years) and 29-31mm mitral 70-degree valves (8.3% at 5 years).

Conclusions:

  • The convexo-concave Björk-Shiley valve, particularly with a 70-degree opening angle, demonstrated a significant risk of mechanical failure.
  • Aortic valve failure led to more rapid circulatory collapse than mitral valve failure.
  • While mechanical failure is a concern, prophylactic replacement is not currently recommended for all patients.

Related Concept Videos