Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

09:48
Discrimination and Characterization of Heterocellular Populations Using Quantitative Imaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2017
7.5K
Practical Characterization Strategies for Comparison, Qualification, and Selection of Cell Viability Detection
Yongyang Huang1, Rachel Watkins2, Samir Patel3
1Revvity Health Sciences, Inc., 360 Merrimack St., Suite 200, Lawrence, MA, 01843, USA. yongyang.huang@revvity.com.
Journal of Fluorescence
|September 22, 2023
Summary
This study introduces strategies to compare cell viability assays, acridine orange/propidium iodide (AO/PI) and acridine orange/4
Area of Science:
- Cellular therapy
- Biotechnology
- Quality Control
Background:
- Cellular therapy development requires robust quality control for therapeutic products.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provides guidance on critical quality attributes (CQAs).
- Cell count and viability are crucial CQAs, but no standardized method exists for cell viability assay selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present strategies for characterizing and comparing acridine orange/propidium iodide (AO/PI) and acridine orange/4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (AO/DAPI) staining methods.
- To evaluate the comparability of cell viability measurements and identify causes of differences.
- To enable selection of a fit-for-purpose cell viability detection method for cellular therapeutic product development.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of AO/PI and AO/DAPI staining using heat-killed (HK) and low temperature/nutrient-deprived (LT/ND) cell death models.
- Investigation of staining time effects and linearity analysis with varying live/dead cell mixtures.
- Validation of viability measurements using a long-term cell proliferation assay.
- Practical application on antibiotic-selected transduced Jurkat and THP-1 cells for functional genomics screening.
Main Results:
- AO/PI and AO/DAPI methods were characterized and compared under different cell death induction conditions.
- Staining time and cell mixture linearity were assessed for both methods.
- Viability measurements were validated against a long-term proliferation assay.
- A practical comparison demonstrated method selection for specific screening applications.
Conclusions:
- The proposed strategies allow for proper characterization, comparison, and selection of cell viability detection methods.
- This work addresses the lack of guidance on qualifying and selecting fit-for-purpose cell viability assays.
- Effective method selection is critical for reliable cellular therapeutic product development and manufacturing.

