Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Association between PROMIS10, SF-36 and NeuroQoL in persons with multiple sclerosis
Brian C Healy1, Yanqing Liu2, Sasha Winston-Khan2
1Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, United States; Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Background:
Patient reported outcome measures (PROs) are considered promising tools for use in clinical settings to measure the impact of disease on physical, mental and social well-being from the patient's perspective. The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.1-Global Health (PROMIS-10) is a measure that is well-suited to clinical practice, but the relationships between this measure and longer PRO measures used in multiple sclerosis (MS) research are unknown.
Methods:
Subjects enrolled in SysteMS: A Systems Biology Study of Clinical, Radiological, and Molecular Markers in Subjects with MS at the Brigham and Women's Hospital were eligible to contribute to the study. 349 subjects completed three PRO measures at study entry: PROMIS-10, Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL™). All questions and global scores from PROMIS-10 were correlated with all domain and summary component scores for SF-36 and all domain scores for Neuro-QoL using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Further, the global scores from PROMIS-10 were correlated with the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and compared between disease categories (relapsing vs progressive MS).
Results:
Strong correlations were observed between PROMIS-10 questions and SF-36 domains aimed at measuring the same construct. Further, the PROMIS-10 Global Physical Health score was correlated with the Physical Component Score from the SF-36 (r = 0.798), and the PROMIS Global Mental Health score was correlated with the Mental Component Score from the SF-36 (r = 0.726). Strong correlations between PROMIS-10 questions and two Neuro-QoL domains (fatigue and lower extremity function) were observed, but other Neuro-QoL domains were not strongly correlated with PROMIS-10 questions. PROMIS-10 Global Physical Health had stronger relationship to EDSS and disease category compared to the Global Mental Health.
Conclusions:
PROMIS-10 questions and global scores are highly correlated with the corresponding domains of SF-36 in PwMS. Neuro-QoL provides different information regarding HRQOL since different domains are being measured.
