Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025
Predictive Measurement for Windlass Change in Length and Selected Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
Published on: March 1, 2024
Comparison of different surgical treatments for stage II progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element
Fanglin Chen1, Chengjie Yuan2, Mian Liang3
1Department of Orthopedics, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Background:
This study analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of different procedures for stage IIA progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) through three-dimensional finite element models.
Methods:
A previous validated stage IIA PCFD FEA model was established consisting of 16 bones, 56 ligaments, 5 muscles and soft tissues. The ligament properties of the spring, deltoid, short plantar and long plantar ligaments, and plantar fascia were attenuated according to a previous publication. Medial column fusion (MCF), medializing calcaneal osteotomy (MCO), lateral column lengthening (LCL), and subtalar joint arthroereisis (SJA) operations were simulated in this model. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, maximum von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia that supported the medial longitudinal arch, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, and talonavicular coverage angle were all compared before and after simulated single-foot weight loading.
Results:
The maximum plantar stress of PCFD decreased with MCO and SJA but increased with MCF and LCL. MCF and LCL failed to significantly reduce the stress on the medial column fragments, thereby increasing their stress. Both MCO and SJA relieved medial plantar stress. MCF had no significant effect on stress relief of the medial ligament. MCO, LCL, and SJA were all shown to reduce the pressure on the medial plantar ligament, with LCL having the most obvious effect. All four procedures corrected the arch deformity; however, MCF was not as effective as the other methods. SJA is the best method for restoring arch height and correcting arch deformities. For stage IIA PCFD, isolated MCF failed to reduce pressure on the medial column; however, isolated MCO significantly reduced the pressure on the medial plantar and ligamentous soft tissues while restoring the foot's arch and correcting the hindfoot valgus.
Conclusion:
SJA with type II sinus tarsi implant effectively transferred pressure from the medial plantar tract to the lateral side and restored the arch. Isolated LCL was not found suitable for stage IIA PCFD.
