Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

106
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
106

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Syncope due to Pacing Inhibition During VT Detection in a Conduction System Pacing ICD Programmed in AAI(R) Mode.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same author

Real-world resource utilization, toxicity management, and efficacy outcomes of CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibodies in B-cell lymphoma: A study from the GELTAMO network.

HemaSphere·2026
Same author

Impact of Acculturation Associated With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Among Mexican Americans.

Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology·2026
Same author

The Impact of Specific Prompt Engineering Techniques on the Readability of LLM-Generated Patient Materials in Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2026
Same author

Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis: a single-center retrospective study in the United States focusing on splenic flexure mobilization in elective sigmoid colectomy.

Journal of minimally invasive surgery·2026
Same author

Retrorectal cystic hamartoma unmasked by coccygeal fracture: a case report and review of presacral tailgut cysts and surgical management.

International journal of surgery case reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

328

Laparoscopic vs. robotic colectomy for left-sided diverticulitis.

Jetsen A Rodriguez-Silva1, William Doyle2, Ashley Alden3

  • 1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine/Tampa General Hospital, 5 Tampa General Circle, Suite 740, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.

Journal of Robotic Surgery
|September 24, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAC) for diverticulitis showed longer operative times, especially in uncomplicated cases. However, both RAC and traditional laparoscopy (LC) had similar patient outcomes and complication rates, suggesting RAC may be beneficial for complicated diverticulitis.

Keywords:
DiverticulitisLaparoscopic surgeryOperative timePostoperative complicationsRobotic surgery

More Related Videos

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

512
Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

328
Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

512
Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Gastrointestinal surgery
  • Minimally invasive surgical techniques
  • Comparative effectiveness research

Background:

  • Diverticulitis is a common condition requiring surgical intervention.
  • The choice between traditional laparoscopy (LC) and robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAC) for diverticulitis surgery is not well-defined.
  • Understanding the comparative outcomes of LC versus RAC is crucial for surgical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAC) versus traditional laparoscopy (LC) for left-sided diverticulitis.
  • To evaluate primary outcomes including major morbidity and 30-day mortality.
  • To assess secondary outcomes such as operative time, conversion rates, and length of stay.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 134 patients undergoing surgery for left-sided diverticulitis between 2019 and 2022.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: traditional laparoscopy (n=86) and robotic-assisted laparoscopy (n=48).
  • Surgical procedures included left colectomy, sigmoid colectomy, low anterior resection, and Hartmann's procedure.

Main Results:

  • Robotic-assisted laparoscopy had a significantly longer operative time (264.8 min) compared to traditional laparoscopy (198.0 min), particularly in uncomplicated diverticulitis.
  • No significant differences were observed between the groups in major morbidity, overall morbidity, conversion to open surgery, ostomy creation, or 30-day readmission rates.
  • There was no 30-day mortality in either the traditional laparoscopy or robotic-assisted laparoscopy groups.

Conclusions:

  • While robotic-assisted laparoscopy for diverticulitis involves longer operative times, it demonstrates comparable patient outcomes and complication rates to traditional laparoscopy.
  • The findings suggest that robotic-assisted laparoscopy may offer advantages for complicated diverticulitis cases, warranting further investigation.
  • Future multi-center studies focusing specifically on complicated diverticulitis are recommended to validate these observations.