Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction01:07

Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction

2.4K
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can be used to determine the 3D structure of biological samples with the help of techniques such as electron microscope tomography and single-particle reconstruction. While single-particle reconstruction can examine macromolecules and macromolecular complexes in vitro conditions only, tomography permits the study of cell components or small cells in vivo.
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
2.4K
X-ray Crystallography02:18

X-ray Crystallography

24.0K
The size of the unit cell and the arrangement of atoms in a crystal may be determined from measurements of the diffraction of X-rays by the crystal, termed X-ray crystallography.
Diffraction
Diffraction is the change in the direction of travel experienced by an electromagnetic wave when it encounters a physical barrier whose dimensions are comparable to those of the wavelength of the light. X-rays are electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths about as long as the distance between neighboring...
24.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Bayesian approach to spectroscopic depth sectioning for locating dopant atoms.

Journal of microscopy·2026
Same author

Locating the atoms at the hard-soft interface of gold nanoparticles.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Dopant Site Occupancy Determined by Core-Loss-Filtered, Position-Averaged Convergent Beam Electron Diffraction.

Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada·2025
Same author

Quantitative Structure Determination from Experimental Four-Dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy via the Scattering Matrix.

Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada·2025
Same author

Optimizing Structure Factors From Four-dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy via the Scattering Matrix.

Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada·2025
Same author

Real-space observation of polarization induced charges at nanoscale ferroelectric interfaces.

Science advances·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Microcrystal Electron Diffraction of Small Molecules
09:48

Microcrystal Electron Diffraction of Small Molecules

Published on: March 15, 2021

6.7K

Determining the Projected Crystal Structure from Four-dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy via the

Alireza Sadri1, Scott D Findlay

  • 1School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Microscopy and Microanalysis : the Official Journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada
|September 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new gradient-descent method to determine electrostatic potential in crystalline materials using scanning transmission electron microscopy. This approach overcomes previous limitations, improving projected structure accuracy.

Keywords:
dynamical scatteringfour-dimensional STEMgradient descentphase retrievalprojected structure determinationscattering matrix

More Related Videos

Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy
15:04

Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy

Published on: July 3, 2021

7.4K
Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction
09:35

Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction

Published on: July 21, 2017

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Microcrystal Electron Diffraction of Small Molecules
09:48

Microcrystal Electron Diffraction of Small Molecules

Published on: March 15, 2021

6.7K
Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy
15:04

Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy

Published on: July 3, 2021

7.4K
Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction
09:35

Microcrystallography of Protein Crystals and In Cellulo Diffraction

Published on: July 21, 2017

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Crystallography
  • Electron Microscopy

Background:

  • Determining projected electrostatic potential in crystalline materials is crucial for understanding their properties.
  • Previous methods based on scattering matrices were limited by the truncation problem.
  • Dynamical scattering effects complicate accurate structure determination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel gradient-descent-based approach for determining projected electrostatic potential.
  • To overcome the truncation problem in scattering-matrix-based methods.
  • To improve the accuracy of projected structure determination in scanning transmission electron microscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) measurements.
  • Employed a gradient-descent optimization algorithm.
  • Solved for the scattering matrix as an intermediate step, addressing the truncation problem.
  • Used analytic expressions for efficient gradient calculations.

Main Results:

  • Successfully determined projected electrostatic potential even with dynamical scattering.
  • The new method overcomes the limitations of previous scattering-matrix-based approaches.
  • Simulated case studies demonstrated significant accuracy improvements through iterative scattering matrix refinement.

Conclusions:

  • The gradient-descent approach offers a robust solution for projected electrostatic potential determination.
  • Iterative refinement of the scattering matrix enhances the accuracy of structural analysis.
  • This method advances the capabilities of 4D-STEM for materials characterization.