Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.7K
People Think That Social Media Platforms Do (but Should Not) Amplify Divisive Content
Steve Rathje1, Claire Robertson1, William J Brady2
1Department of Psychology & Center for Neural Science, New York University.
Summary
People believe divisive and negative content goes viral on social media, but prefer positive, accurate, and educational content to spread. There is broad consensus on desired content amplification by platforms.
Area of Science:
- Social Media Studies
- Communication Research
- Public Opinion
Background:
- Social media algorithms amplify content, but public perception of viral content is understudied.
- Understanding user perceptions is crucial for regulating social media algorithms.
- Previous research identified content types likely to spread virally.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate public perceptions of what content goes viral and what content should go viral on social media.
- To inform the debate on improving and regulating social media algorithms.
Main Methods:
- A nationally representative survey of 511 U.S. participants.
- Assessed perceptions of social media virality and desired content amplification.
Main Results:
- Participants believe divisive, negative, and misinformation content are likely to go viral.
- Conversely, participants desire accurate, nuanced, and educational content to go viral.
- Perceptions showed broad consensus, with weak correlations to political orientation and demographics.
Conclusions:
- A significant gap exists between content perceived as viral and content desired to be amplified.
- Public consensus on desired content can inform social media platform improvements and regulation.
- Findings highlight potential for aligning platform amplification with user values.
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Social Traps
22.4K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.4K
Bias
4.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.3K
Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K

