Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

152
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
152
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

145
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
145
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

262
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
262
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.8K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating bias in target trial emulation for heart failure across statistical and deep learning methods.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Parental body mass index and offspring childhood body size and eating behaviour: A structural equation modelling analysis in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

Identifying druggable proteins of the association of chronotype on breast cancer using Mendelian randomization.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Using human genetic variation to estimate the effect of lipoprotein(a) lowering on pregnancy outcomes.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Evaluating confounding in rare variant genome wide association studies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Integrating immune-cell transcriptomic data with Mendelian randomisation reveals novel causal genes for type 2 diabetes and its complications.

Diabetologia·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Systematic comparison of Mendelian randomisation studies and randomised controlled trials using electronic databases.

Maria K Sobczyk1, Jie Zheng2,3,4, George Davey Smith2

  • 1MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK maria.sobczyk@bristol.ac.uk.

BMJ Open
|September 26, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Triangulating Mendelian randomization (MR) with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is valuable but challenging due to data gaps. Automation is limited, requiring careful consideration of study design factors for reliable comparisons.

Keywords:
Clinical trialsEPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIESEPIDEMIOLOGY

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

579
Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
05:10

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

579
Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
05:10

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are key epidemiological methods.
  • Distinct assumptions necessitate comparing MR and RCT evidence for robust findings.
  • Triangulation between these methods offers unique insights into causality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility of semi-automated triangulation between MR and RCT evidence.
  • To identify challenges and opportunities for integrating evidence from these distinct study designs.
  • To scope the potential for automated data linkage and comparison.

Main Methods:

  • Literature search across ClinicalTrials.Gov, PubMed, and EpigraphDB.
  • Manual comparison of 54 MR publications with 77 RCT publications.
  • Analysis of data coverage in clinical trial registries and semantic databases.

Main Results:

  • Low result submission rates for completed RCTs (13%) in ClinicalTrials.Gov.
  • Limited coverage of semantic triples from MR (36%) and RCTs (12%) in SemMedDB.
  • Automatic matching of interventions was feasible only for pharmaceuticals due to annotation limitations.

Conclusions:

  • Triangulating MR and RCT evidence requires addressing data availability and annotation challenges.
  • Successful triangulation depends on aligning phenotypes, interventions, populations, and evidence quality.
  • Manual literature review indicates potential for triangulation if technical hurdles are overcome.