A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective "less invasive surfactant

Wolfgang Göpel1, Tanja K Rausch2, Barbara Mitschdörfer3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. wolfgang.goepel@uksh.de.

Trials
|September 26, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is a key treatment for preterm infants. This study investigates the long-term benefits of prophylactic LISA in infants with low oxygen needs, aiming to optimize respiratory support strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatology
  • Pediatric Pulmonology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a primary cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants.
  • Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is recommended for preterm infants requiring >30% supplemental oxygen.
  • The prophylactic use of LISA in infants needing ≤30% oxygen and long-term outcomes remain understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of prophylactic Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in preterm infants.
  • To compare lung function at age 5 years between infants receiving prophylactic LISA and those receiving standard care.
  • To determine if prophylactic LISA is superior to selective treatment for preterm infants with low oxygen requirements.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving preterm infants (25-28 weeks gestational age) with spontaneous breathing and ≤30% supplemental oxygen.
  • Infants were randomized to either prophylactic LISA or continued continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment.
  • Primary outcome: forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV1) z-scores at age 5 years; secondary outcomes include lung function, development, and infection rates.

Main Results:

  • The pro.LISA trial is designed to provide robust data on the long-term benefits of prophylactic LISA.
  • Current observational data suggest approximately 50% of eligible infants receive LISA, indicating variability in practice.
  • Short-term safety will be assessed, including in-hospital mortality and complications.

Conclusions:

  • Robust data on the long-term benefits of prophylactic LISA are currently lacking.
  • The pro.LISA trial will clarify whether prophylactic LISA should be standard care for all preterm infants or if selective treatment is more appropriate.
  • Findings will inform clinical practice regarding surfactant administration in preterm neonates.
Abstract