Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
Published on: May 31, 2021
Assessing System Justification in Czech Population Using the System Justification Scale
1INESAN (Institute for Evaluations and Social Analyses), Sokolovská 351/25, 18600 Prague, Czech Republic.
System justification (SJ) is a social psychology concept explaining how people perceive fairness and social order. The validated System Justification Scale (SJS) demonstrates robust psychometric properties for measuring this construct.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- System justification (SJ) is a well-established social psychology construct.
- SJ explains how individuals perceive fairness, evaluate societal conditions, and accept social order.
- SJ applies to both advantaged and disadvantaged groups, potentially mitigating negative perceptions of inequality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To translate and validate the System Justification Scale (SJS) for use in the Czech population.
- To provide comprehensive psychometric data on the SJS, including internal consistency, unidimensionality, and construct validity.
Main Methods:
- Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
- Internal consistency assessment, analysis of variance, and correlation analysis.
- Face-to-face survey data from 1419 Czech adults (aged 18-79).
Main Results:
- The translated SJS demonstrated high internal consistency.
- The scale exhibited robust psychometric properties, including adequate discrimination of system justification levels.
- Factor analysis confirmed the scale's structure and validity.
Conclusions:
- The Czech version of the SJS is a psychometrically sound instrument.
- The validated SJS is recommended for future research on system justification and perceived quality of life.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:

