Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Comparing Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Model Established in Mouse Kidney and on Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane
Published on: February 8, 2020
Regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients across the USA
Lukas Scheipner1,2, Stefano Tappero3,4,5, Mattia Luca Piccinelli3,6,7
1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada. l.scheipner@medunigraz.at.
Purpose:
To test for regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) patients across the USA.
Methods:
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2018) was used to tabulate patient (age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity), tumor (N stage, sites of metastasis) and treatment characteristics (proportions of nephrectomy and systemic therapy), according to 12 SEER registries. Multinomial regression models, as well as multivariable Cox regression models, tested the overall mortality (OM) adjusting for those patient, tumor and treatment characteristics.
Results:
In 9882 ccmRCC patients, registry-specific patient counts ranged from 4025 (41%) to 189 (2%). Differences across registries existed for sex (24-36% female), race/ethnicity (1-75% non-Caucasian), N stage (N1 25-35%, NX 3-13%), proportions of nephrectomy (44-63%) and systemic therapy (41-56%). Significant inter-registry differences remained after adjustment for proportions of nephrectomy (46-63%) and systemic therapy (35-56%). Unadjusted 5-year OM ranged from 73 to 85%. In multivariable analyses, three registries exhibited significantly higher OM (SEER registry 5: hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, p = 0.0001; SEER registry 7:HR 1.15, p = 0.008M SEER registry 10: HR 1.15, p = 0.04), relative to the largest reference registry (n = 4025).
Conclusion:
Important regional differences including patient, tumor and treatment characteristics exist, when ccmRCC patients included in the SEER database are studied. Even after adjustment for these characteristics, important OM differences persisted, which may require more detailed analyses to further investigate these unexpected differences.
More Related Videos
12:22The Use of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays RPPA to Explore Protein Expression Variation within Individual Renal Cell Cancers
Published on: January 22, 2013
06:38A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017