Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Analyzing Craniofacial Morphogenesis in Zebrafish Using 4D Confocal Microscopy
Published on: January 30, 2014
Caudal Fgfr1 disruption produces localised spinal mis-patterning and a terminal myelocystocele-like phenotype in mice
Eirini Maniou1, Faduma Farah1, Abigail R Marshall1
1Developmental Biology and Cancer Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Abstract:
Closed spinal dysraphisms are poorly understood malformations classified as neural tube (NT) defects. Several, including terminal myelocystocele, affect the distal spine. We have previously identified a NT closure-initiating point, Closure 5, in the distal spine of mice. Here, we document equivalent morphology of the caudal-most closing posterior neuropore (PNP) in mice and humans. Closure 5 forms in a region of active FGF signalling, and pharmacological FGF receptor blockade impairs its formation in cultured mouse embryos. Conditional genetic deletion of Fgfr1 in caudal embryonic tissues with Cdx2Cre diminishes neuroepithelial proliferation, impairs Closure 5 formation and delays PNP closure. After closure, the distal NT of Fgfr1-disrupted embryos dilates to form a fluid-filled sac overlying ventrally flattened spinal cord. This phenotype resembles terminal myelocystocele. Histological analysis reveals regional and progressive loss of SHH- and FOXA2-positive ventral NT domains, resulting in OLIG2 labelling of the ventral-most NT. The OLIG2 domain is also subsequently lost, eventually producing a NT that is entirely positive for the dorsal marker PAX3. Thus, a terminal myelocystocele-like phenotype can arise after completion of NT closure with localised spinal mis-patterning caused by disruption of FGFR1 signalling.
Insights
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) signaling is crucial for proper spinal cord (SC) development. Disruption of FGFR1 in mice leads to neural tube (NT) defects resembling human terminal myelocystocele.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Biology
- Neuroscience
- Genetics
Background:
- Closed spinal dysraphisms, including terminal myelocystocele, are poorly understood neural tube (NT) defects affecting the distal spine.
- A specific NT closure site, Closure 5, has been identified in the distal spine of mice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1) signaling in the formation of Closure 5 and posterior neuropore (PNP) closure.
- To characterize the resulting NT defects and their resemblance to human terminal myelocystocele.
Main Methods:
- Morphological analysis of mouse and human caudal-most closing posterior neuropore (PNP).
- Pharmacological blockade of FGF signaling in cultured mouse embryos.
- Conditional genetic deletion of Fgfr1 in caudal embryonic tissues using Cdx2Cre mice.
- Histological analysis of spinal cord development and gene expression (SHH, FOXA2, OLIG2, PAX3).
Main Results:
- Closure 5 formation occurs in a region of active FGF signaling; FGF receptor blockade impairs its formation.
- FGFR1 disruption in mice diminishes neuroepithelial proliferation, impairs Closure 5 formation, and delays PNP closure.
- Fgfr1-disrupted embryos exhibit distal NT dilation, resembling terminal myelocystocele, with ventral spinal cord flattening and progressive loss of ventral NT domains (SHH, FOXA2, OLIG2), leading to a dorsalized NT (PAX3).
Conclusions:
- FGFR1 signaling is essential for proper Closure 5 formation and posterior neuropore closure.
- Disruption of FGFR1 signaling can lead to terminal myelocystocele-like phenotypes after NT closure due to localized spinal mis-patterning.
- This study highlights the critical role of FGFR1 in distal spinal cord development and provides insights into the etiology of spinal dysraphisms.
More Related Videos
07:40Dissection of the Auditory Bulla in Postnatal Mice: Isolation of the Middle Ear Bones and Histological Analysis
Published on: January 4, 2017
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017