Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Iterative Optimization of DNA Duplexes for Crystallization of SeqA-DNA Complexes
Published on: November 1, 2012
DNA major versus minor groove occupancy of monomeric and dimeric crystal violet derivatives. Toward structural
Aren Mirzakhanian1, Michael Khoury1, Donald E Trujillo1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA 91330, USA.
Abstract:
Six monomeric (1a-1f) and five dimeric (2a-2e) derivatives of the triphenylmethane dye crystal violet (CV) have been prepared. Evaluation of the binding of these compounds to CT DNA by competitive fluorescent intercalator displacement (FID) assays, viscosity experiments, and UV and CD spectroscopy suggest that monomeric derivative 1a and dimeric derivative 2d likely associate with the major groove of DNA, while dimeric derivatives 2a and 2e likely associate with the minor groove of DNA. Additional evidence for the groove occupancy assignments of these derivatives was obtained from ITC experiments and from differential inhibition of DNA cleavage by the major groove binding restriction enzyme BamHI, as revealed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The data indicate that major groove ligands may be optimally constructed from dye units containing a sterically bulky 3,5-dimethyl-N,N-dimethylaniline group; furthermore, the groove-selectivity of olefin-tethered dimer 2d suggests that stereoelectronic interactions (n → π*) between the ligand and DNA are also an important design consideration in the crafting of major-groove binding ligands.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pinching-off of Coated Vesicles
Single-Strand DNA Binding Proteins

