Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Inter-individual differences in children's short-term energy compensation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nicole A Reigh1, Alaina L Pearce1, Barbara J Rolls1
1The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States.
Insights
Children often overeat after a preload, showing poor energy compensation. Children with overweight or obesity undercompensated more than healthy-weight peers, indicating weight status impacts energy regulation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric nutrition and metabolism
- Behavioral science and appetite regulation
Background:
- Energy intake regulation is crucial for maintaining energy balance, especially in children.
- The preloading paradigm is commonly used to assess short-term energy compensation, but significant variability exists in pediatric studies.
- Understanding factors influencing this variability is essential for accurate assessment of children's energy regulation.
Approach:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following standard guidelines, searching PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science.
- Data from 29 experiments were extracted, with 13 included in meta-analyses, focusing on study design and participant characteristics.
- The energy compensation index (COMPx) was the primary outcome, with random intercept-only models used to test associations with sex, age, and weight status.
Key Points:
- Children demonstrated undercompensation, meaning they overate relative to the preload energy consumed (β = -0.38; P = 0.008).
- No significant associations were found between energy compensation and child's sex (β = 0.11; P = 0.76), age (β = 0.03; P = 0.75), or continuous weight (β = -0.07, P = 0.37).
- Children with overweight/obesity showed significantly greater undercompensation compared to healthy-weight children (β = 0.18; P = 0.04).
Conclusions:
- Significant variability exists in children's energy compensation, with weight status being a key differentiating factor.
- Standardization of preloading protocols and adequately powered studies are recommended to better understand inter-individual differences.
- Alternative methods to COMPx may be necessary for a more comprehensive characterization of children's energy compensation abilities.
Background:
The ability to regulate energy intake is often assessed using a preloading paradigm to measure short-term energy compensation. In children, large variability exists with this paradigm both within- and across- studies and is poorly understood.
Objectives:
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to better understand factors contributing to variability in children's energy compensation. We tested 1) whether children demonstrated "good" energy compensation, defined as adjusting meal intake commensurate with preload intake and 2) differences in children's energy compensation by child age, sex, and weight status (assessed both continuously and categorically).
Methods:
Standard guidelines for systematic review were followed to search PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science. Data on study design (preload form, preload-to-meal interval, preload energy difference, study setting) and participant characteristics (sex, age, weight status) were extracted from 29 experiments meeting inclusion criteria, and 13 were included in meta-analyses. COMPx (energy compensation index), a linear transformation comparing food intake following a high- vs. low-energy preload, was the outcome. Hedge's g was calculated, and random intercept-only models tested associations between COMPx and sex, age, and weight status.
Results:
The systematic review revealed mixed results regarding children's energy compensation and the role of inter-individual differences. Meta-analytic models revealed that children undercompensated (overate) for preload energy (β = -0.38; P = 0.008). Sex (β = 0.11; P = 0.76), age (β = 0.03; P = 0.75), and weight (assessed continuously; β = -0.07, P = 0.37) were not related to compensation. Children with overweight/obesity (assessed categorically) undercompensated more than children with healthy weight (β = 0.18; P = 0.04).
Conclusions:
The systematic review highlighted wide variability across studies, while the meta-analysis demonstrated differences in COMPx by child weight status but not by age or sex. Standardizing protocols across studies is recommended, along with designing adequately powered studies aiming to test inter-individual differences a priori. Alternative approaches to the use of COMPx are recommended to allow better characterization of children's energy compensation ability. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020197748.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Energy Budgets
Energy Balance
Adler's Individual Psychology
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Production Efficiency

