Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Innovative Use of nsPEF to Boost Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
Published on: May 3, 2024
Ultra-Low Intensity Post-Pulse Affects Cellular Responses Caused by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields
Kamal Asadipour1,2, Carol Zhou2, Vincent Yi3
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.
Post-pulse waveforms in nanosecond pulse electric fields (nsPEF) significantly alter cell responses, impacting tumor elimination. Researchers found these low-intensity after-effects, often overlooked, dictate distinct cellular outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Cell Biology
- Electroporation
Background:
- High-intensity nanosecond pulse electric fields (nsPEF) are known for inducing regulated cell death and tumor elimination.
- Cellular responses to nsPEF are typically linked to primary pulse characteristics like duration, amplitude, and number.
- The influence of low-intensity post-pulse waveforms has been largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of differing post-pulse waveforms on cellular responses to nsPEF.
- To compare cellular effects generated by two distinct nsPEF pulse generator designs (Blumlein line and pulse forming line) with similar primary pulses but different post-pulses.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Blumlein line (BL) and pulse forming line (PFL) generators producing nsPEF with nearly identical primary pulses (100 ns duration).
- Analyzed differences in post-pulse characteristics (duration, polarity) between BL (~50 µs, opposite polarity) and PFL (~2 µs, same polarity).
- Assessed cellular responses including mitochondrial membrane potential dissipation, cell viability, plasma membrane permeability (PI uptake), reactive oxygen species generation, spare respiratory capacity (SRC), and trans-plasma membrane electron transport (tPMET).
Main Results:
- Different post-pulses led to distinct cellular responses despite similar primary waveforms.
- PFL exhibited lower thresholds for mitochondrial potential dissipation, viability loss, and PI permeability compared to BL.
- PFL decreased SRC, while BL increased it; PFL uniquely induced a biphasic effect on tPMET.
Conclusions:
- Low-intensity post-pulse conditions significantly influence cell responses to nsPEF.
- Post-pulse waveform characteristics must be considered when comparing nsPEF studies, even with similar primary pulse parameters.
- This finding opens new avenues for optimizing nsPEF applications by controlling post-pulse characteristics.
More Related Videos
08:06Author Spotlight: Optimizing Porous Substrate Electroporation Through Micro and Nanochannels for Enhanced Monitoring and Intermediate Stage Characterization
Published on: September 27, 2024
10:12Monitoring Electroporation-Induced Changes in Action Potential Generation in Genetically Engineered Tet-On Spiking HEK cells
Published on: September 6, 2024