Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
Published on: August 14, 2018
Population Genetic Analysis of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis Based on cpDNA Fragments
Dan Wang1, Yu Huang1,2, Lu Rui1
1The Chongqing Engineering Laboratory for Green Cultivation and Deep Processing of Three Gorges Reservoir Area's Medicinal Herbs, College of Food and Biology Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing 404120, China.
Abstract:
Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis is a well-known medicinal plant that is mainly distributed in Southwest China; however, its genetic diversity and biodiversity processes are poorly understood. In this study, the sequences of cpDNA trnL-trnF fragments of 15 wild populations and 17 cultivated populations of P. polyphylla var. yunnanensis were amplified, sequenced, and aligned to study the population genetics of this species. Genetic diversity was analyzed based on nucleotide diversity, haplotype diversity, Watterson diversity, population-level diversity, and species-level genetic diversity. Genetic structure and genetic differentiation were explored using haplotype distribution maps and genetic distance matrices. A total of 15 haplotypes were identified in the 32 populations of P. polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Five unique haplotypes were identified from the fourteen haplotypes of the cultivated populations, while only one unique haplotype was identified from the ten haplotypes of the wild populations. The haplotype richness and genetic diversity of the cultivated populations were higher than those of the wild populations (H = 0.900 vs. 0.861). In addition, there were no statistically significant correlations between geographic distance and genetic distance in the cultivated populations (r = 0.16, p > 0.05), whereas there was a significant correlation between geographical distance and genetic structure in the wild populations (r = 0.32, p > 0.05), indicating that there was a geographical and genetic connection between the wild populations. There was only 2.5% genetic variation between the wild populations and cultivated populations, indicating no obvious genetic differentiation between the wild and cultivated populations. Overall, the genetic background of the cultivated populations was complex, and it was hypothesized that the unique haplotypes and higher diversity of the cultivated populations were caused by the mixed provenance of the cultivated populations.
More Related Videos
12:01A PCR-based Genotyping Method to Distinguish Between Wild-type and Ornamental Varieties of Imperata cylindrica
Published on: February 20, 2012
10:33Multi-locus Variable-number Tandem-repeat Analysis of the Fish-pathogenic Bacterium Yersinia ruckeri by Multiplex PCR and Capillary Electrophoresis
Published on: June 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs