Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

On the implications of shifting Hepatitis B vaccine policy for surgical patients.

Vaccine·2026

Same author

Variation in Postdischarge Opioid Prescribing After Childbirth and Associated Procedures.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026

Same author

Discussion: A Geospatial Analysis of State-Level Access to Registered U.S. Replantation Centers.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026

Same author

Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Opioid Prescribing at Discharge for Inpatients Undergoing Surgery (LESS Study): An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Anesthesiology·2026

Same author

Bridging the Gap: Implementation and Uptake of AUDIT-C Alcohol Screening for Inpatient Surgery.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2026

Same author

Treatment gaps for opioid use disorder among commercially insured US surgical patients, 2016-2022.

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Strengthening Association through Causal Inference.

Megan Lane¹, Nicholas L Berlin¹, Kevin C Chung²

¹From the Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Michigan Health System.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

|September 28, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This review explores quasi-experimental methods to infer causality from observational health data. These techniques, including regression discontinuity and interrupted time series, are vital when randomization isn't feasible.

More Related Videos

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

Health research methodology
Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

Causal inference is crucial for understanding health risks and treatment effectiveness.
Experimental designs are not always feasible for clinical research.
Observational data offers valuable insights when randomization is inappropriate.

Approach:

This review highlights quasi-experimental methods for causal inference from observational data.
Methods discussed include regression discontinuity, interrupted time series, and difference-in-differences.
The focus is on deducing causality in contexts where randomized controlled trials are not viable.

Key Points:

Quasi-experimental methods enable causal inference from non-randomized studies.
Regression discontinuity, interrupted time series, and difference-in-differences are key approaches.
Understanding assumptions and limitations is essential for accurate causal interpretation.

Conclusions:

Quasi-experimental methods expand the interpretation of causal relationships in observational health data.
These techniques are particularly valuable for surgical conditions and other clinical research areas.
Applying these methods enhances the ability to study health risks and intervention effectiveness.