Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

Planning Nursing Care I

Planning Nursing Care I

The planning phase of the nursing process helps nurses set priorities, outline patient-centered goals and expected outcomes, and tailor nursing interventions to align with the aligned care plan. Through the planning phase, the nurse applies critical thinking skills to align and develop interventions according to the patient's needs. It provides continuity of care allowing patients to receive the maximum benefit from treatment. It serves as a pilot plan for allocating individual staff to a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Exploring spatial uncertainty in HIV risk locations: individual characteristics and geographic reporting accuracy.

BMC public health·2026

Same author

Urban safety and the role of hydrant structure and configuration.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Patterns of sexual minority men's lifestyle and healthcare related activity spaces in Los Angeles.

Health & place·2025

Same author

Novel Location-Based Survey Using Cognitive Interviews to Assess Geographic Networks and Hotspots of Sex and Drug Use: Implementation and Validation Study.

JMIR formative research·2023

Same author

Physical distancing as an integral component of pandemic response.

Letters in spatial and resource sciences·2023

Same author

Enhancing strategic defensive positioning and performance in the outfield.

Journal of geographical systems·2022

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

Evaluation of forest treatment planning considering multiple objectives.

B Amelia Pludow¹, Alan T Murray¹, Vanessa Echeverri¹

¹Department of Geography, University of California at Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.

Journal of Environmental Management

|September 28, 2023

Summary

This study found that common forest planning tools produce suboptimal solutions for wildfire risk mitigation. These tools do not fully capture the range of possible tradeoffs between competing land management objectives.

Keywords:

Forest restoration Fuel management Land use planning Spatial optimization Tradeoffs Wildfire

More Related Videos

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems

Published on: June 30, 2020

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems

Published on: June 30, 2020

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Area of Science:

Environmental Management
Forestry Science
Operations Research

Background:

Land use planning involves balancing competing objectives, often resulting in multiple Pareto (tradeoff) solutions.
Heuristic methods are widely used in software for multi-objective land use planning, but solution quality is uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the solution quality of a widely used forest planning tool for wildfire risk mitigation.
To assess if the tool adequately balances multiple objectives under spatial treatment restrictions.

Main Methods:

The study evaluated a specific forest planning tool using measures of completeness, inferiority, and maximum gap.
The evaluation was conducted across diverse geographic settings and problem sizes.

Main Results:

Solutions generated by the evaluated tool were found to be suboptimal.
The tool failed to represent the full spectrum of possible tradeoffs between objectives.

Conclusions:

Current heuristic-based forest planning tools may not meet the needs of environmental managers seeking optimal land use decisions.
Further development is needed to improve the quality and completeness of solutions for multi-objective forest planning.