Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

04:57
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
10.2K
The Integrated i31-GEP Test Outperforms the MSKCC Nomogram at Predicting SLN Status in Melanoma Patients
Michael Tassavor1, Brian J Martin2, Alex M Glazer3
1Skin Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A.
Anticancer Research
|September 29, 2023
Summary
The integrated 31-gene expression profile (i31-GEP) test more accurately predicts sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity in melanoma patients than traditional nomograms. This improves patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and risk-aligned management.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Surgical Pathology
Background:
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a prognostic tool for cutaneous melanoma, but 88% of patients have negative results.
- Some patients with negative SLNB results may still experience disease progression.
- The integrated 31-gene expression profile (i31-GEP) test offers personalized risk prediction for SLN positivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of the i31-GEP test for SLNB guidance against a nomogram using only clinicopathologic factors.
- To evaluate the performance of i31-GEP in identifying patients with a low risk of SLN positivity.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 465 patients with T1-T2 tumors and known SLN status.
- Comparison of i31-GEP test results with a Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram.
- Application of a 5% risk threshold for SLN positivity.
Main Results:
- In patients with <5% predicted risk, SLN positivity was 2.7% for i31-GEP versus 10.0% for MSKCC (p=0.026).
- The i31-GEP maintained a false-negative rate below the 5% threshold across T-categories for patients predicted to have <5% risk.
- The MSKCC nomogram did not consistently maintain a false-negative rate below the 5% threshold.
Conclusions:
- The i31-GEP test, integrating gene expression and clinicopathologic factors, outperforms nomograms based solely on clinicopathologic factors in predicting SLN status.
- Clinical integration of i31-GEP can enhance patient identification for SLNB.
- Improved patient selection via i31-GEP can lead to more effective risk-aligned management strategies for melanoma.

