Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Quantitative approaches for including equity in risk and resilience infrastructure planning analyses
Thushara Gunda1, Amanda Wachtel1, Shruti Khadka Mishra1
1Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
A new logic model integrates community equity priorities into quantitative infrastructure risk assessments. This framework enhances planning for critical infrastructure, ensuring equitable and sustainable development goals are met.
Area of Science:
- Engineering
- Environmental Science
- Social Science
Background:
- Critical infrastructure risk and resilience assessments traditionally focus on objectives like natural hazard evaluation and investment optimization.
- While research has begun to address externalities, integrating equity priorities early in project planning is crucial but lacks a standardized methodology.
- Existing approaches often fail to incorporate specific community needs and priorities into quantitative risk assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel logic model for developing equity-informed quantitative approaches in infrastructure planning.
- To provide a standardized methodology for incorporating diverse community priorities and geographical nuances into risk assessments.
- To demonstrate the framework's applicability across various critical infrastructure sectors.
Main Methods:
- Development of a logic model employing a graded, iterative approach to define equity objectives.
- Tailoring the logic model to specific geographies and community priorities for integration into mathematical risk assessment approaches.
- Application and demonstration of the framework through case studies involving aviation fuel, produced water, and microgrid electricity infrastructures.
Main Results:
- The logic model effectively clarifies how local priorities and infrastructure needs inform data selection and quantitative methodologies.
- Case studies illustrate the framework's utility in integrating community nuances, such as asset ownership, into infrastructure assessments.
- Explicit consideration of methodological limitations and stakeholder engagement enhanced transparency and integration of local context.
Conclusions:
- The proposed logic model offers a standardized approach for equity-informed quantitative infrastructure risk assessment.
- Integrating community priorities and nuances leads to more transparent, equitable, and effective infrastructure planning.
- This framework supports the development of long-lasting solutions aligned with energy and sustainable development goals.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...

