Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025
Minimally Invasive Murine Laryngoscopy for Close-Up Imaging of Laryngeal Motion During Breathing and Swallowing
Published on: December 1, 2023
Prospective Evaluation and Validation of the Laryngoscore and the mini-Laryngoscore
Camille Clarysse1, Jeroen Meulemans1,2, Charlotte van Lierde1,2
1Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Objective:
The Laryngoscore was described in 2014 as a practical preoperative assessment tool to predict difficult laryngeal exposure (DLE) during transoral approaches to the larynx. In 2019 the authors proposed a version with a reduced number of variables, called the mini-Laryngoscore. We aim to critically appraise and externally validate these two tools and if needed and possible, to optimize these tools.
Methods:
103 consecutive patients who underwent a microlaryngoscopy between November 2017 and June 2020 at the Leuven University Hospitals were prospectively included and subjected to a presurgical evaluation of 15 parameters and a peroperative scoring of the anterior commissure visualization. Subsequent analysis focused on the concordance of our findings with those of Piazza et al., the discriminatory ability of the test, and the validity of the included items. We then evaluated a modified prediction tool.
Results:
Of 103 patients, 18 (17.5%) had DLE. The Laryngoscore and mini-Laryngoscore predicted this with a "good" C-index of respectively 0.727 (95%CI: 0.608-0.846) and 0.714 (95%CI: 0.605-0.823). A newly created prediction tool including only three parameters (Interincisors gap, upper jaw dental status and previous treatments) showed a better discriminatory ability (C-index = 0.835, 95%CI: 0.726-0.944) than the original Laryngoscore, a finding that needs further external validation.
Conclusion:
The original Laryngoscore and the mini-Laryngoscore displayed a good discriminative ability. Some parameters can be left out of the Laryngoscore without losing discrimination. An even better prediction model seems possible, using a weighted sum of selected predictor variables and by using the parameters in their continuous form.
Level Of Evidence:
2 Laryngoscope, 134:1807-1812, 2024.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
01:21Larynx
Anatomy of the Larynx
The larynx consists of various components, including cartilage, muscles, and vocal cords. Its structure includes three large unpaired cartilages—the thyroid, cricoid, and epiglottis—and three smaller paired cartilages—the arytenoids,...
01:29Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
01:23Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
01:19Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
01:26Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.