Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
State insurance mandates and racial and ethnic inequities in assisted reproductive technology utilization
Ann Korkidakis1, Carol DeSantis2, Dmitry Kissin3
1Boston IVF-The Eugin Group, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Objective:
To examine whether the (1) scope of state-mandated insurance coverage for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and (2) proportion of the population eligible for this coverage are associated with reductions in racial/ethnic inequities in ART utilization.
Design:
National cross-sectional, ecologic study.
Subjects:
We employed estimates from the US Census Bureau of all women 20-44 years of age living in the US in 2018. Data on the number of women who initiated an ART cycle during that year that were reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were obtained from the National ART Surveillance System.
Exposure:
State mandates were classified according to the scope of required coverage for fertility services: Comprehensive, Limited, and No Mandate.
Main Outcome Measures:
Race and ethnic-specific ART utilization rates, defined as the number of women undergoing ≥1 ART cycles per 10,000 women, were the primary outcomes. As state mandates do not apply to all insurance plans, Comprehensive Mandate utilization rates were recalculated using denominators corrected for the estimated proportions of populations eligible for coverage.
Results:
Across all mandate categories, Non-Hispanic (NH) Asian and NH White populations had the highest ART utilization rates, whereas the lowest rates were among Hispanic, NH Black, and NH Other/Multiple Races populations. Compared with the NH Asian reference group, the NH Black population had smaller inequities in the Comprehensive Mandate group than the No Mandate group (rate ratio [RR 0.33 [0.28-0.38] vs. RR 0.23 [0.22-0.24]). Using the Comprehensive Mandate group for each race/ethnicity as the reference, the NH Black and NH Other/Multiple Races populations showed the largest relative differences in utilization between the No Mandate and Comprehensive Mandate groups (RR 0.39 [0.37-0.41] and 0.33 [0.28-0.38], respectively). Within the Comprehensive Mandate group, the disparities in the Hispanic and NH Black populations moved toward the null after correcting for state-mandated insurance eligibility.
Conclusions:
Racial/ethnic inequities in ART utilization were reduced in states with comprehensive infertility coverage mandates. Inequities were further attenuated after correcting for mandate eligibility. Mandates alone, however, were not sufficient to eliminate disparities. These findings can inform future strategies aimed at improving ART access under a social justice framework.
More Related Videos
06:11Author Spotlight: Exploring the Long-Term Health Impacts of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection on Offspring
Published on: May 17, 2024
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Standards of Care I
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Nondisjunction
Regression Toward the Mean