Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Evaluation of Left Ventricular Mass in Different Cardiac Geometry Using Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced
Meiqing Zhang1, Xu Chen2, Feifei Yang3
1Department of Cardiology, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Insights
Contrast-enhanced 3D echocardiography (Contrast-3DE) and SPECT show consistent left ventricular mass (LVM) measurements in cardiomyopathy patients. Contrast-3DE effectively reduces LVM overestimation compared to standard 2D echocardiography (2DE).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Accurate measurement of left ventricular mass (LVM) is crucial for diagnosing and managing cardiac conditions like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and other forms of left ventricle (LV) enlargement.
- Traditional 2D echocardiography (2DE) methods may overestimate LVM, potentially impacting clinical decisions.
- Contrast-enhanced 3D echocardiography (Contrast-3DE) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are advanced imaging techniques used for cardiac assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of LVM measurements obtained by 2DE, contrast-enhanced 2DE (Contrast-2DE), 3DE, and Contrast-3DE against SPECT.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of contrast enhancement in reducing LVM overestimation by echocardiographic methods.
- To assess the agreement between different imaging modalities in patients with various cardiac conditions, including HCM, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).
Main Methods:
- A study cohort of 69 patients, including 23 with HCM, 26 with LV enlargement (16 DCM, 10 ICM), and 20 controls, underwent 2DE, Contrast-2DE, 3DE, Contrast-3DE, and SPECT.
- Left ventricular mass (LVM) was measured using 2DE-AL and 3DE methods and compared with SPECT reference values.
- Statistical analysis was performed to assess agreement (r-value) and deviation between methods, with particular attention to different patient groups.
Main Results:
- All echocardiographic methods (2DE-AL, Contrast-2DE-AL, 3DE, Contrast-3DE) systematically overestimated LVM compared to SPECT (P < 0.05).
- Contrast-3DE demonstrated the best agreement with SPECT for LVM measurement (r = 0.898, P < 0.001) with the smallest deviation (5.7 ± 23.1 g).
- 3DE showed greater LVM overestimation than Contrast-3DE in LV hypertrophy and enlargement groups. No significant difference in LVM was observed between 2DE with and without contrast in any patient group.
Conclusions:
- Contrast-3DE and SPECT provide consistent LVM measurements, particularly in cardiomyopathy patients, outperforming standard 2DE methods.
- Contrast enhancement significantly reduces the overestimation of LVM observed with non-contrast echocardiography.
- Contrast-3DE is a valuable tool for accurate LVM assessment, offering improved agreement with SPECT compared to other echocardiographic techniques.
Abstract:
A total of 69 patients were enrolled in the study, including 23 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 26 patients with Left Ventricle (LV) enlargement comprising 16 dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients and 10 ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients, and 20 control subjects. All patients underwent 2DE, contrast-enhanced 2DE (Contrast-2DE), 3DE, Contrast-3DE, and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) examinations. The 2DE-AL and 3DE methods measured the left ventricular mass (LVM). The results were compared with those measured by SPECT. The measured LVM of the 69 patients was systematically overestimated by 2DE-AL (177.4 ± 56.2 g), Contrast-2DE-AL (174.5 ± 55.5 g), 3DE (167.3 ± 59.2 g), and Contrast-3DE (154.2 ± 46.7 g) when compared with SPECT (148.5 ± 52.4 g) (P < 0.05), while Contrast-3DE provided the best agreement with SPECT in LVM measurement (r = 0.898, P < 0.001) and had the smallest deviation (5.7 ± 23.1 g). 3DE overestimated LVM more compared to Contrast-3DE in LV hypertrophy group (165.5 ± 37.9 g versus 153.5 ± 27.6 g, P = 0.003) and LV enlargement group (204.5 ± 69.3 g versus 183.5 ± 53.5 g, P = 0.006). For 2DE methods, there was no significant difference between the LVM obtained with or without contrast enhancement in control group (132.3 ± 23.6 g versus 128.4 ± 23.3 g), LV hypertrophy group (177.7 ± 38.6 versus 178.3 ± 30.9 g, P = 0.889), and LV enlargement group (211.9 ± 63.2 g versus 206.5 ± 66.0 g, P = 0.386). The difference between LVM measured by 2DE-AL and SPECT was the greatest (27.9 ± 34.0 g), especially in LV hypertrophy group and LV enlargement group (LV hypertrophy group 39.7 ± 26.0 g; LV enlargement group 24.2 ± 42.8 g). To conclude, Contrast-3DE and SPECT show greater consistency in LVM measurement, especially in cardiomyopathy, when compared with 2DE. Administering contrast can effectively reduce the overestimation of LVM by non-contrast DE.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

