Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting01:18

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

824
The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
824
Bar Graph01:07

Bar Graph

16.6K
A bar graph is also called a bar chart and consists of bars that are separated from each other. It either uses horizontal or vertical bars to show comparisons among categories. The bars can be rectangles, or they can be rectangular boxes (used in three-dimensional plots). One axis of the graph represents the specific categories being compared, and the other axis shows a discrete value. In this graph, the length of the bar for each category is proportional to the number or percent of individuals...
16.6K
Signal Flow Graphs01:18

Signal Flow Graphs

248
Signal-flow graphs offer a streamlined and intuitive approach to representing control systems, providing an alternative to traditional block diagrams. These graphs use branches to symbolize systems and nodes to represent signals, effectively illustrating the relationships and interactions within the system.
In a signal-flow graph, branches denote the system's transfer functions, while nodes represent the signals. The direction of signal flow is indicated by arrows, with the corresponding...
248
Vector Algebra: Graphical Method01:10

Vector Algebra: Graphical Method

12.2K
Vectors can be multiplied by scalars, added to other vectors, or subtracted from other vectors. The vector sum of two (or more) vectors is called the resultant vector or, for short, the resultant.
We use the laws of geometry to construct resultant vectors, followed by trigonometry to find vector magnitudes and directions. For a geometric construction of the sum of two vectors in a plane, we follow the parallelogram rule. Suppose two vectors are at arbitrary positions. Translate either one of...
12.2K
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting01:26

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

1.0K
Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
1.0K
pV-Diagrams01:18

pV-Diagrams

4.2K
The pV diagram, which is a graph of pressure versus volume of the gas under study, is helpful in describing certain aspects of the substance. When the substance behaves like an ideal gas, the ideal gas equation describes the relationship between its pressure and volume. On a pV diagram, it is common to plot an isotherm, which is a curve showing p as a function of V with the number of molecules and the temperature fixed. Then, for an ideal gas, the product of the pressure of the gas and its...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using the Nested Structure of Knowledge to Infer What Others Know.

Psychological science·2025
Same author

Expectations of Processing Ease, Informativeness, and Accuracy Guide Toddlers' Processing of Novel Communicative Cues.

Cognitive science·2023
Same author

Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?

Evolutionary human sciences·2023
Same author

The shortlist effect: nestedness contributions as a tool to explain cultural success.

Evolutionary human sciences·2023
Same author

The puzzle of ideography.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Plankton Response to Climate Change Through Time-Series Data and Artistic Expression
08:15

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Plankton Response to Climate Change Through Time-Series Data and Artistic Expression

Published on: July 28, 2023

1.3K

Puzzling out graphic codes.

Olivier Morin1,2

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology, Minds & Traditions Research Group, Jena, Germany morin@shh.mpg.de; https://www.shh.mpg.de/94549/themintgroup.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|October 2, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study urges treating graphic codes as distinct systems, not art or speech byproducts. Understanding ideography requires viewing graphic codes seriously to solve communication puzzles.

More Related Videos

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
06:10

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions

Published on: March 31, 2023

993
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Plankton Response to Climate Change Through Time-Series Data and Artistic Expression
08:15

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Plankton Response to Climate Change Through Time-Series Data and Artistic Expression

Published on: July 28, 2023

1.3K
Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
06:10

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions

Published on: March 31, 2023

993
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Semiotics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The nature of graphic codes, particularly ideography, remains a subject of debate.
  • Existing theories often conflate graphic codes with visual art or spoken language derivatives.
  • The puzzle of ideography lies in understanding its unique properties and evolutionary patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for treating graphic codes as independent systems.
  • To clarify the relationship between writing and spoken language.
  • To analyze and propose solutions for the puzzle of ideography.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing commentaries on graphic codes and ideography.
  • Argumentation based on the distinct nature of graphic codes versus visual art.
  • Evaluation of different theoretical accounts for the evolution of ideography.

Main Results:

  • Graphic codes derive their power from more than just iconicity.
  • A learning account, even revised, fails to explain the lack of evolution in ideographies.
  • The proposed 'standardization account' offers a more viable explanation for ideographic stability.

Conclusions:

  • Ideographies do not evolve due to inherent standardization, not excessive communication cost.
  • Viewing graphic codes seriously as codes is crucial for understanding ideography.
  • The findings have implications for the future evolution and study of ideography.