Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

08:30
Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry
Published on: June 6, 2018
9.1K
Separation and flow cytometry analysis of microplastics and nanoplastics
Jingjing Li1, Fuyi Huang1,2, Guohui Zhang1,3
1Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China.
Frontiers in Chemistry
|October 2, 2023
Summary
This study enhances flow cytometry for microplastic and nanoplastic detection using Nile red staining. Optimized protocols improve accuracy and lower detection limits for environmental analysis.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Analytical Chemistry
- Toxicology
Background:
- Flow cytometry is increasingly used for microplastic analysis.
- Current methods require improvement for accurate microplastic and nanoplastic enumeration.
- Nile red (NR) staining is a common technique, but its efficiency can be enhanced.
Purpose of the Study:
- To optimize flow cytometry protocols for enhanced detection of Nile red-stained microplastics and nanoplastics.
- To improve the accuracy and sensitivity of microplastic and nanoplastic quantification.
- To provide a robust method for assessing microplastic and nanoplastic pollution.
Main Methods:
- Optimized Nile red staining protocols by adjusting dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) concentration.
- Utilized specific dot plots (side scatter vs. yellow fluorescence) for accurate enumeration.
- Determined optimal NR staining concentration (15-20 μg/mL) and flow cytometry parameters.
- Employed sequential filtration for microplastic and nanoplastic separation and concentration.
- Validated the method across eleven microplastic types and in simulated water samples.
Main Results:
- Increased DMSO concentration (20%-30%) improved NR solubility and reduced agglomeration.
- Optimal NR staining concentration determined to be 15-20 μg/mL.
- Microplastic detection lower limit established at 10^4 particles/mL, with an optimal range of 10^5-10^6 particles/mL.
- Minimum detectable particle size for flow cytometry was 150 nm.
- Filtration and flow cytometry method showed high recovery rates (0.80-1.19) for microplastics and nanoplastics in simulated samples.
Conclusions:
- The enhanced flow cytometry protocol provides accurate and sensitive quantification of microplastics and nanoplastics.
- The optimized method is effective for diverse microplastic types and environmental matrices.
- This approach offers crucial technical support for microplastic and nanoplastic toxicity assessments.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Flow Cytometry
13.1K
The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...
In...
13.1K
Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation
5.7K
Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.
5.7K

