Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Blood Flow Imaging with Ultrafast Doppler
Published on: October 14, 2020
Ultra-fast ultrasound blood flow velocimetry for carotid artery with deep learning
Bingbing He1, Jian Lei1, Xun Lang1
1Department of Electronic Engineering, Information School, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China.
Abstract:
Accurate measurement of blood flow velocity is important for the prevention and early diagnosis of atherosclerosis. However, due to the uncertainty of parameter settings, the autocorrelation velocimetry methods based on clutter filtering are prone to incorrectly filter out the near-wall blood flow signal, resulting in poor velocimetric accuracy. In addition, the Doppler coherent compounding acts as a low-pass filter, which also leads to low values of blood flow velocity estimated by the above methods. Motivated by this status quo, here we propose a deep learning estimator that combines clutter filtering and blood flow velocimetry based on the adaptive property of one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN). The estimator is operated by first extracting the blood flow signal from the original Doppler echo signal through an affine transformation of the 1D convolution, and then converting the extracted signal into the desired blood flow velocity using a linear transformation function. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by simulation as well as in vivo carotid artery data. Compared with typical velocimetry methods such as high-pass filtering (HPF) and singular value decomposition (SVD), the results show that the normalized root means square error (NRMSE) obtained by 1DCNN is reduced by 54.99 % and 53.50 % for forward blood flow velocimetry, and 70.99 % and 69.50 % for reverse blood flow velocimetry, respectively. Consistently, the in vivo measurements demonstrate that the goodness-of-fit of the proposed estimator is improved by 8.72 % and 4.74 % for five subjects. Moreover, the estimation time consumed by 1DCNN is greatly reduced, which costs only 2.91 % of the time of HPF and 12.83 % of the time of SVD. In conclusion, the proposed estimator is a better alternative to the current blood flow velocimetry, and is capable of providing more accurate diagnosis information for vascular diseases in clinical applications.
More Related Videos
10:41Analysis of Cerebral Vasospasm in a Murine Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with High Frequency Transcranial Duplex Ultrasound
Published on: June 3, 2021
12:00Non-invasive Parenchymal, Vascular and Metabolic High-frequency Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Rat Deep Brain Imaging
Published on: March 2, 2015