Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education
Erin A Cech1, William Rothwell2
1Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Michigan, 500 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) students in engineering face greater marginalization, devaluation, and negative health outcomes. These issues are widespread across institutions, indicating a need for systemic change.
Area of Science:
- Engineering Education Research
- Social Sciences
- Higher Education Studies
Background:
- While gender and racial/ethnic inequalities in engineering are documented, LGBTQ+ experiences remain understudied.
- Prior research has not systematically explored day-to-day inequalities faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in engineering programs.
- This study addresses the gap in understanding LGBTQ+ status as an axis of difference in engineering education.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence and nature of inequality experienced by LGBTQ+ students in engineering.
- To determine if LGBTQ+ students face greater marginalization and devaluation of their work compared to non-LGBTQ+ peers.
- To examine the relationship between LGBTQ+ status and negative health and wellness outcomes in engineering education.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of survey data from 1729 undergraduate students across eight U.S. engineering programs.
- Inclusion of 141 students identifying as LGBTQ+ to assess their unique experiences.
- Quantitative assessment of marginalization, devaluation, and health/wellness outcomes.
Main Results:
- LGBTQ+ students report higher levels of marginalization and devaluation than their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts.
- Health and wellness disparities among LGBTQ+ students are linked to experiences of marginalization and devaluation.
- Limited variation in climate across institutions suggests widespread anti-LGBTQ+ bias in engineering education.
Conclusions:
- Urgent need for reflexive research on LGBTQ+ inequality within engineering education.
- Call for institutional and cultural shifts to mitigate anti-LGBTQ+ bias.
- Emphasis on the necessity of improved support systems for LGBTQ+ students in engineering programs.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
04:15Author Spotlight: Enhancing Engineering Education via WebVR-Based Online Laboratories
Published on: February 23, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Equivalent Couples
Two couples are considered to be equivalent if they produce the same rotational effect on a rigid body. In other words, the two couples have the same magnitude and act in the same direction, causing the same angular displacement or acceleration in the body.
For instance, consider two couples lying in the plane of the page, with one having a pair of equal...
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Space Trusses: Problem Solving
Consider a tripod consisting of a tetrahedral space truss with a ball-and-socket joint at C. Suppose the height and lengths of the horizontal and vertical...
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving
Space Trusses
At the core of a space truss lies the fundamental unit known as the tetrahedron. This structure is composed of six members that form a three-dimensional shape...