Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Patient and Provider Decision Making About HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Following Sexual Violence: A Qualitative
Jocelyn C Anderson1, Michelle D S Boakye, Jessica Draughon Moret
1Jocelyn C. Anderson, PhD, RN, SANE-A, is an Assistant Professor, Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. Michelle D. S. Boakye, PhD, MPH, RN, is a Postdoctoral Fellow, Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA. Jessica Draughon Moret, PhD, RN, is an Associate Clinical Professor, Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing at UC Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Understanding patient and provider decisions about HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) after sexual assault is crucial. Improving communication and policy can enhance access and decision-making for HIV PEP.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Medical Sociology
- Infectious Disease Prevention
Background:
- Sexual assault survivors require timely medical care, including HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP).
- Decision-making processes for initiating and adhering to HIV PEP can be complex for both patients and healthcare providers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the decision-making factors influencing HIV PEP provision for patients and healthcare providers following sexual assault.
- To identify barriers and facilitators in the HIV PEP decision-making process for sexual assault survivors.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative descriptive study utilizing semistructured interviews with 15 patients and 10 healthcare providers.
- Thematic analysis was employed to derive key themes from interview data.
Main Results:
- Four major themes emerged: medical concerns, emotional/trauma/support factors, daily medication management, and ensuring access to HIV PEP.
- Significant variations were observed in how patients and providers prioritized and described these themes.
- Patient decision-making was influenced by trauma, information processing, and side effect management, differing from provider perspectives.
Conclusions:
- Aligning provider communication with patient-centered decision-making factors, such as trauma-informed care, can improve HIV PEP uptake.
- Systemic policy changes are necessary to improve equitable access to HIV PEP for sexual assault survivors, reducing reliance on individual provider efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

