Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

280
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
280
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.5K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

145
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
145
Survival Curves01:18

Survival Curves

192
Survival curves are graphical representations that depict the survival experience of a population over time, offering an intuitive way to track the proportion of individuals who remain event-free at each time point. These curves are widely used in fields such as medicine, public health, and reliability engineering to visualize and compare survival probabilities across different groups or conditions.
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
192
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

105
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
105

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Linking Minimally Important Differences (MID) and Acceptable Regret to Elicit Values and Preferences in Health Decision Models.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

How to determine the optimal duration of anticoagulation for VTE: an evidence-based decision-analytical approach.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

GRADE Guidance: Update on Developing Good Practice Statements in Guidelines.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Theory of clinical therapeutic progress: reconciling equipoise with fat-tailed (skewed) outcomes.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Converting Evidence-Based Summary of Findings Evidence Tables Into Decision Analytical, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and Life Expectancies Metrics: A Tutorial.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Using Decision Curve Analysis to Evaluate Testing and/or Predictive Modeling.

Benjamin Djulbegovic1, Iztok Hozo2

  • 1Hematology Stewardship Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. djulbegov@musc.edu.

Cancer Treatment and Research
|October 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluates diagnostic tests and predictive models across all thresholds. This method, grounded in expected utility and regret theories, enhances clinical decision-making value assessment.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Decision Making
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Assessing the clinical utility of diagnostic tests and predictive models is crucial.
  • Existing methods often evaluate performance at a single threshold, limiting comprehensive assessment.
  • Decision curve analysis (DCA) offers a framework for evaluating model utility across a spectrum of thresholds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the threshold model for evaluating diagnostic and predictive models.
  • To demonstrate the application of decision curve analysis (DCA) for comprehensive model evaluation.
  • To provide a framework for assessing the net clinical benefit of models across all possible thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • The study extends the threshold model to incorporate decision curve analysis (DCA).
  • DCA is utilized to evaluate the value of diagnostic tests and predictive models.
  • The methodology is framed within the principles of expected utility theory (EUT) and expected regret theory (ERT).

Main Results:

  • Decision curve analysis (DCA) enables the evaluation of model performance across a range of clinical thresholds.
  • The approach facilitates a more thorough understanding of a model's net clinical benefit.
  • The framework supports informed decisions regarding the adoption and use of predictive models.

Conclusions:

  • Decision curve analysis (DCA) provides a robust method for evaluating the clinical utility of diagnostic tests and predictive models.
  • Extending the threshold model with DCA enhances the assessment of model value across all relevant thresholds.
  • The integration of EUT and ERT principles offers a theoretical foundation for DCA in clinical practice.