Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

92.0K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
92.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do you feel obliged to trust in strangers? The role of obligations, desires and expectations on trust.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Varieties of Negligence.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

An AI-powered research assistant in the lab: A practical guide for text analysis through iterative collaboration with LLMs.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Memories of forgiven wrongs: the role of interpersonal closeness and severity when remembering forgiven transgressions.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same author

Does Maximizing Good Make People Look Bad?

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K

Purity is linked to cooperation but not necessarily through self-control.

Samuel Murray1,2,3, Santiago Amaya1,4, William Jiménez-Leal1,5

  • 1Laboratorio de Juicios y Emociones Morales, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|October 4, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Victimless pleasures are often seen as immoral because they reduce self-control. However, this study questions the link between self-control and cooperation, finding exceptions to this rule.

More Related Videos

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.5K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.5K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Moral Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • The moralization of behaviors is often linked to their perceived impact on self-control.
  • Fitouchi et al. propose that activities are moralized based on whether they enhance or diminish self-control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the proposed relationship between self-control and the moralization of behaviors.
  • To examine whether victimless pleasures and restrained behaviors align with predictions based on self-control alteration.

Main Methods:

  • The study likely involved theoretical analysis and examination of existing examples or case studies.
  • It critically evaluates the predictions derived from the self-control theory of moralization.

Main Results:

  • Several behavioral examples were identified that contradict the theory's predictions.
  • These counterexamples suggest that the link between self-control and moralization is not universally applicable.

Conclusions:

  • The general relationship between self-control and cooperation, as proposed by Fitouchi et al., is called into question.
  • Further research is needed to understand the complex factors influencing the moralization of behaviors beyond self-control.