Focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis both contribute to regional hypoperfusion assessed by post-processing

Jeremy Weiner1, Corinna Heinisch1, Salome Oeri2

  • 1Cardiology, Hospital Centre of Biel, Biel, Switzerland.

Abstract

Insights

Quantitative perfusion and ECV in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) improve assessment of myocardial ischemia. These methods detect abnormalities missed by traditional visual assessment, offering deeper insights into ischemic heart disease.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Cardiac MRI

Background:

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is increasingly used to evaluate myocardial ischemia and viability.
  • Traditional methods like first-pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) have limitations in detecting balanced ischemia and diffuse fibrosis.
  • Quantitative perfusion (QP) and extracellular volume (ECV) offer potential solutions by measuring absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and diffuse fibrosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the utility of post-processing techniques for quantifying pixelwise MBF and diffuse fibrosis in patients undergoing clinically indicated stress-CMR exams.
  • To assess if focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis, along with other quantified CMR features, explain individual MBF findings.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective observational study included 109 patients undergoing clinically indicated stress-CMR.
  • Quantitative perfusion (QP) was used to measure MBF during regadenoson stress.
  • T1 mapping was employed to calculate extracellular volume (ECV) for diffuse fibrosis assessment.

Main Results:

  • QP analysis quantified global and regional perfusion, identifying abnormalities beyond visual assessment.
  • ECV analysis detected diffuse fibrosis in areas without LGE.
  • Multivariable analysis revealed LGE and ECV as independent predictors of reduced MBF (p<0.001).
  • In patients without visual perfusion deficits, age and wall thickness also predicted poor MBF (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative analysis of MBF and ECV identifies regional tissue abnormalities missed by traditional visual assessment in stress-CMR.
  • Multi-parametric quantitative analysis holds promise for refining the etiological work-up of myocardial ischemia.
  • These advanced techniques may provide deeper insights into ischemic heart disease management.