Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
Decision-making as discovery: Vetting clinical research in a leading precision oncology service
Alberto Cambrosio1, Jonah Campbell1, Alexander E Drilon2
1Department of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract:
Based on fieldwork carried out at the Early Drug Development Service of a world-leading cancer institution, our study sheds lights on decision-making processes at the stage where decisions are made about which clinical trial to pursue and thus which experimental drugs will feed the growing pipeline of molecularly guided therapies and therapeutic strategies available to treating physicians. The paper shows how such collective decision-making practices by a translational research unit employ formal tools and ad hoc valuation strategies that interweave technical-scientific matters of concern with patient-oriented clinical ones, as part of the institutional assetization of biomedical knowledge production. In the process, decision-making practices in part define the conditions of possibility for the provision of care in what is increasingly becoming a 'clinic of variants.' They do so by reconfiguring on an evolving basis the socio-material ecosystem through which precision oncology is enacted as a rapidly evolving assemblage of patients, physicians, research and support staff, protocols, molecular markers, drugs and administrative components.
Insights
This study examines how decisions are made on experimental cancer drugs for clinical trials. It reveals how these choices shape precision oncology by integrating scientific data with patient care needs.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Translational Research
- Health Systems Science
Background:
- Early drug development services are crucial for advancing cancer therapies.
- The selection of clinical trials dictates the future pipeline of precision oncology treatments.
- Understanding decision-making in this context is vital for optimizing drug development and patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the decision-making processes for selecting experimental drugs in early drug development.
- To explore how scientific and clinical factors are integrated in these decisions.
- To understand the role of these decisions in shaping the landscape of precision oncology.
Main Methods:
- Fieldwork conducted at an Early Drug Development Service.
- Analysis of collective decision-making practices within a translational research unit.
- Examination of formal tools and ad hoc valuation strategies used in decision-making.
Main Results:
- Decision-making involves a blend of technical-scientific and patient-oriented clinical considerations.
- These practices contribute to the institutional 'assetization' of biomedical knowledge.
- The process reconfigures the socio-material ecosystem of precision oncology.
Conclusions:
- Decision-making in early drug development significantly influences the availability of molecularly guided therapies.
- These practices are central to the evolving 'clinic of variants' and precision oncology.
- The study highlights the dynamic interplay of various components in enacting precision oncology.
More Related Videos
07:03Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology
Published on: December 1, 2023
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Drug Discovery: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...