Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

Interference: Path Lengths

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The freedom to choose may be an artifact of a preference for spatial location.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026

Same author

Episodic memory: Rats can remember the context.

Current biology : CB·2026

Same author

Episodic memory in animals?

Translational neuroscience·2025

Same author

Ephemeral reward task: Why is it so difficult for pigeons to learn it?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025

Same author

Peter Urcuioli's lasting contribution: Animal memory research and an important model of stimulus class formation.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025

Same author

Complex relationship between response rate and preference in pigeons: Williams (1992) revisited.

Learning & behavior·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Aging on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Learning

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Aging on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Learning

Published on: February 16, 2024

Interference of same/different learning by a spatial discrimination.

Daniel N Peng¹, Thomas R Zentall¹

¹University of Kentucky, United States.

Behavioural Processes

|October 5, 2023

Summary

Pigeons learned matching-to-sample tasks slower when one rule was inconsistent. This suggests that consistent matching rules facilitate concept learning in pigeons.

Keywords:

Matching Mismatching Pigeons Same-different concept Spatial discrimination

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Using MazeSuite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation

Using MazeSuite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation

Published on: October 8, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Aging on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Learning

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Aging on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Learning

Published on: February 16, 2024

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Using MazeSuite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation

Using MazeSuite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation

Published on: October 8, 2011

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Animal behavior

Background:

Matching-to-sample is a key paradigm for studying concept formation in animals.
Previous research shows pigeons can learn matching concepts, but acquisition isn't always facilitated by multiple similar tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if introducing an inconsistent spatial rule alongside matching rules retards learning.
To explore the interaction between different types of associative learning in pigeons.

Main Methods:

Pigeons were trained on a matching-to-sample task with three colors requiring a matching response.
A fourth color required a spatial (left-side) response, creating an inconsistent rule.
Acquisition rates were compared to a control group trained on a consistent four-color matching task.

Main Results:

Pigeons acquired the task with the inconsistent spatial rule significantly slower than the consistent matching task.
This indicates that introducing a non-matching rule interferes with the learning of consistent matching associations.

Conclusions:

Consistent rules facilitate the development of a matching concept in pigeons.
Inconsistent rules can impede learning, suggesting an interaction among learned associations.