Tropicamide Versus Cyclopentolate for Cycloplegic Refraction in Pediatric Patients With Brown Irides: A Randomized

Wejdan Al-Thawabieh1, Rami Al-Omari2, Diala Walid Abu-Hassan3

  • 1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Hospital (W.A.-T.), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

PubMed

Insights

Tropicamide 1% and cyclopentolate 1% showed statistically significant differences in cycloplegic refraction for children, but the changes were clinically insignificant. Tropicamide may be a safe alternative for pediatric eye exams.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Optometry
  • Clinical Trial Research

Background:

  • Accurate refractive error assessment is crucial for pediatric eye care.
  • Cycloplegic refraction is essential for determining true refractive error in children.
  • Tropicamide and cyclopentolate are commonly used cycloplegic agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of tropicamide 1% versus cyclopentolate 1% for cycloplegic refraction in children aged 3-16 years.
  • To evaluate the clinical significance of refractive changes induced by these agents in pediatric patients.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, controlled, multicenter prospective clinical trial was conducted.
  • Children aged 3-16 years with brown irides received either tropicamide 1% or cyclopentolate 1% in one visit.
  • A second cycloplegic refraction was performed using the alternative agent after a minimum 1-week interval.

Main Results:

  • A total of 185 eyes from 94 children were analyzed.
  • Both tropicamide and cyclopentolate induced statistically significant changes in spherical equivalent (SE) (P < .001).
  • The difference in mean change in SE (ΔSE) between cyclopentolate (1.15±1.2) and tropicamide (1.04±1.2) was statistically significant (P < .001) but clinically insignificant.

Conclusions:

  • Tropicamide 1% demonstrated comparable cycloplegic efficacy to cyclopentolate 1% in children aged 3-16 years.
  • Tropicamide may serve as an effective and safe alternative to cyclopentolate for routine cycloplegic refraction in nonstrabismic pediatric populations.
  • Refractive changes were clinically insignificant across all refractive error groups.
Abstract