Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Simulating Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Using a Neonatal Piglet Model
Published on: May 26, 2023
Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial
Ahmed F Elmahrouk1,2, Mohammad S Shihata3, Osman O Al-Radi3,4
1Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre,, MBC J-16, P.O. Box: 40047, 21499, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A_marouky@hotmail.com.
Insights
Custodiol cardioplegia is as effective as blood-based cardioplegia for myocardial protection in pediatric cardiac surgery. This randomized trial found no significant differences in key outcomes between the two methods.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Cardioplegia Solutions
Background:
- Blood-based cardioplegia is the standard for myocardial protection in pediatric cardiac surgery.
- Custodiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate) is an alternative cardioplegia solution.
- The comparative effectiveness of Custodiol versus blood-based cardioplegia requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if Custodiol cardioplegia is non-inferior to blood-based cardioplegia for myocardial protection in pediatric cardiac surgery.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Custodiol in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
- To compare clinical outcomes between Custodiol and blood-based cardioplegia.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment was conducted.
- Pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were eligible, excluding emergency cases.
- The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, prolonged ICU stay, or intervention-requiring arrhythmia.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in the composite primary endpoint between the Custodiol (60.75%) and blood cardioplegia (59.66%) groups (P=0.87).
- Secondary endpoints including hospital stay, inotropic score, troponin levels, and ventricular function showed no significant differences.
- Long-term survival analysis (median follow-up 32.75 months) also revealed no difference between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Custodiol cardioplegia demonstrates non-inferiority to blood-based cardioplegia for myocardial protection in pediatric cardiac surgery.
- The findings support Custodiol as a viable alternative to blood-based cardioplegia in this patient population.
- Further research may explore specific subgroups or long-term functional outcomes.
Background:
Blood-based cardioplegia is the standard myocardial protection strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery. Custadiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate), an alternative, may have some advantages but is potentially less effective at myocardial protection. This study aimed to test whether custadiol is not inferior to blood-based cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Methods:
The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with a blinded outcome assessment. All pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia, including neonates, were eligible. Emergency surgery was excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of death within 30 days, an ICU stay longer than 5 days, or arrhythmia requiring intervention. Secondary endpoints included total hospital stay, inotropic score, cardiac troponin levels, ventricular function, and extended survival postdischarge. The sample size was determined a priori for a noninferiority design with an expected primary outcome of 40% and a clinical significance difference of 20%.
Results:
Between January 2018 and January 2021, 226 patients, divided into the Custodiol cardioplegia (CC) group (n = 107) and the blood cardioplegia (BC) group (n = 119), completed the study protocol. There was no difference in the composite endpoint between the CC and BC groups, 65 (60.75%) vs. 71 (59.66%), respectively (P = 0.87). The total length of stay in the hospital was 14 (Q2-Q3: 10-19) days in the CC group vs. 13 (10-21) days in the BC group (P = 0.85). The inotropic score was not significantly different between the CC and BC groups, 5 (2.6-7.45) vs. 5 (2.6-7.5), respectively (P = 0.82). The cardiac troponin level and ventricular function did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.34 and P = 0.85, respectively). The median duration of follow-up was 32.75 (Q2-Q3: 18.73-41.53) months, and there was no difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.55).
Conclusions:
Custodial cardioplegia is not inferior to blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection in pediatric patients. Trial registration The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, and the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier number is NCT03082716 Date: 17/03/2017.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use

