Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Predicting acute aortic syndrome using aortic dissection detection risk score, D-dimer, and X-ray
Dae Ho Song1, Jin Ho Choi2, Jang Young Lee1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Combining the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS), age-adjusted D-dimer (DDage-adj), and chest radiography findings significantly improves acute aortic syndrome (AAS) diagnosis. This strategy achieves a 0% failure rate in low-risk patients, enhancing diagnostic accuracy for this critical condition.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a life-threatening condition with high mortality.
- Previous screening tools like the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) and D-dimer (DD) have shown screening failures.
- There is a need for more accurate diagnostic tools for AAS in the emergency department (ED).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of combining ADD-RS, age-adjusted D-dimer (DDage-adj), and chest radiography findings for AAS.
- To evaluate the impact of this combined strategy on reducing screening failures in ED patients.
Main Methods:
- A single-center retrospective case-control study involving 93 AAS patients and 465 non-AAS chest pain patients.
- Comparison of initial clinical presentations and laboratory findings, including DDage-adj and chest radiography.
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant predictors of AAS.
Main Results:
- Age-adjusted DD (DDage-adj) demonstrated 92.5% sensitivity and 76.3% specificity for AAS.
- Positive chest radiography findings showed 89.2% sensitivity and 80.9% specificity.
- In low-risk patients (ADD-RS ≤1), the combination of chest radiography and DDage-adj achieved 100% sensitivity, 67.1% specificity, and a 0% failure rate.
Conclusions:
- The combination of ADD-RS, DDage-adj, and chest radiography significantly lowers the failure rate for AAS exclusion.
- This integrated approach offers a low failure rate (<3%) with a specificity of 67.8% for AAS diagnosis.
- Specific radiographic findings like widened mediastinum, aortic contour widening, and aortic kinking are crucial indicators in AAS diagnosis, particularly in low-risk groups.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests

