Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
Published on: February 22, 2019
Evaluation and comparison of immune responses induced by two Mpox mRNA vaccine candidates in mice
Xidan Yang1,2, Congxia Hu1, Xuetao Yang1,2
1School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Abstract:
The epidemic of Mpox virus (MPXV) from May 2022 was once declared as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by the World Health Organization. Vaccines play an important role in prevention of infectious diseases, and mRNA vaccine technology was proved to be a safe and effective platform with successful application in defense of coronavirus disease 2019. In this study, based on A29L, M1R, A35R, and B6R of MPXV, we developed two MPXV mRNA vaccine candidates, designated as MPXfus and MPXmix. The MPXfus was one-component, in which these four antigen proteins were linked in tandem by flexible linker and encoded by an individual mRNA as a fusion protein. The MPXmix was multicomponent containing four mRNA, and each mRNA encoded one antigen protein respectively. Mice were immunized with equal quality of MPXfus or MPXmix, delivered by lipid nanoparticles for evaluation and comparison of the immune responses induced by these two MPXV vaccine candidates. Results of immune response analyses indicated that both MPXfus and MPXmix could elicit high-level of antigen-specific antibodies and robust cellular immune response in mice. Moreover, results of virus neutralization assays suggested that sera from MPXfus- or MPXmix-immunized mice possessed high neutralizing activities against vaccinia virus. In addition, titers of antigen-specific antibody, levels of cellular immune response, and activities of neutralizing antibody against vaccinia virus induced by MPXfus and MPXmix presented no significant difference. In summary, this study provides valuable insights for further clinical development of one-component and multicomponent mRNA vaccine candidates for the prevention of MPXV and other orthomyxoviruses.
Insights
Two novel mRNA vaccine candidates, MPXfus and MPXmix, were developed for Mpox virus (MPXV) prevention. Both candidates induced comparable high-level antibody and cellular immune responses in mice, showing promise for MPXV vaccine development.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Vaccine Technology
Background:
- The 2022 Mpox virus (MPXV) epidemic highlighted the need for effective vaccines.
- Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology offers a safe and effective platform for infectious disease prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and compare two MPXV mRNA vaccine candidates: a one-component fusion protein (MPXfus) and a multicomponent cocktail (MPXmix).
- To evaluate the immunogenicity and efficacy of these candidates in a mouse model.
Main Methods:
- MPXV antigens (A29L, M1R, A35R, B6R) were used to design MPXfus and MPXmix mRNA vaccines.
- Vaccines were delivered via lipid nanoparticles to mice.
- Immune responses, including antibody titers and cellular immunity, were analyzed.
- Virus neutralization assays were performed against vaccinia virus.
Main Results:
- Both MPXfus and MPXmix elicited high levels of antigen-specific antibodies and robust cellular immune responses in mice.
- Sera from immunized mice demonstrated significant neutralizing activity against vaccinia virus.
- No significant differences were observed between MPXfus and MPXmix in antibody titers, cellular immunity, or neutralizing antibody activity.
Conclusions:
- Both one-component (MPXfus) and multicomponent (MPXmix) mRNA vaccine strategies are effective in inducing protective immune responses against MPXV in mice.
- These findings support the further clinical development of mRNA vaccines for MPXV and other orthomyxoviruses.
More Related Videos
08:15In Vitro Cellular Activity Evaluation of the Nanoemulsion Vaccine Adjuvant Ophiopogonin D
Published on: December 9, 2022
07:32Evaluating the Immune Response of a Nanoemulsion Adjuvant Vaccine Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA Infection
Published on: September 1, 2023