Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025
Rapid Detection of Helicobacter pylori Virulence and Typing Using Quantum Dot Labeling Technology
Published on: June 13, 2025
Real-Time Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori Infection by Convolution Neural Network During White-Light Endoscopy: A
Yuqin Shen1,2, Angli Chen3, Xinsen Zhang4
1Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Introduction:
Convolutional neural network during endoscopy may facilitate evaluation of Helicobacter pylori infection without obtaining gastric biopsies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnosis accuracy of a computer-aided decision support system for H. pylori infection (CADSS-HP) based on convolutional neural network under white-light endoscopy.
Methods:
Archived video recordings of upper endoscopy with white-light examinations performed at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (January 2019-September 2020) were used to develop CADSS-HP. Patients receiving endoscopy were prospectively enrolled (August 2021-August 2022) from 3 centers to calculate the diagnostic property. Accuracy of CADSS-HP for H. pylori infection was also compared with endoscopic impression, urea breath test (URT), and histopathology. H. pylori infection was defined by positive test on histopathology and/or URT.
Results:
Video recordings of 599 patients who received endoscopy were used to develop CADSS-HP. Subsequently, 456 patients participated in the prospective evaluation including 189 (41.4%) with H. pylori infection. With a threshold of 0.5, CADSS-HP achieved an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.97) with sensitivity and specificity of 91.5% (95% CI 86.4%-94.9%) and 88.8% (95% CI 84.2%-92.2%), respectively. CADSS-HP demonstrated higher sensitivity (91.5% vs 78.3%; mean difference = 13.2%, 95% CI 5.7%-20.7%) and accuracy (89.9% vs 83.8%, mean difference = 6.1%, 95% CI 1.6%-10.7%) compared with endoscopic diagnosis by endoscopists. Sensitivity of CADSS-HP in diagnosing H. pylori was comparable with URT (91.5% vs 95.2%; mean difference = 3.7%, 95% CI -1.8% to 9.4%), better than histopathology (91.5% vs 82.0%; mean difference = 9.5%, 95% CI 2.3%-16.8%).
Discussion:
CADSS-HP achieved high sensitivity in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in the real-time test, outperforming endoscopic diagnosis by endoscopists and comparable with URT. Clinicaltrials.gov ; ChiCTR2000030724.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:28Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
01:26Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
01:16Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
01:29Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
01:25Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy