Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025
Primed Mycobacterial Uveitis PMU as a Model for Post-Infectious Uveitis
Published on: December 17, 2021
The Orphan Drug for Acanthamoeba Keratitis (ODAK) Trial: PHMB 0.08% (Polihexanide) and Placebo versus PHMB 0.02% and
John K G Dart1, Vincenzo Papa2, Paolo Rama3
1Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Institute of Health Research, Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Purpose:
To compare topical PHMB (polihexanide) 0.02% (0.2 mg/ml)+ propamidine 0.1% (1 mg/ml) with PHMB 0.08% (0.8 mg/ml)+ placebo (PHMB 0.08%) for Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) treatment.
Design:
Prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, multicenter phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03274895).
Participants:
One hundred thirty-five patients treated at 6 European centers.
Methods:
Principal inclusion criteria were 12 years of age or older and in vivo confocal microscopy with clinical findings consistent with AK. Also included were participants with concurrent bacterial keratitis who were using topical steroids and antiviral and antifungal drugs before randomization. Principal exclusion criteria were concurrent herpes or fungal keratitis and use of antiamebic therapy (AAT). Patients were randomized 1:1 using a computer-generated block size of 4. This was a superiority trial having a predefined noninferiority margin. The sample size of 130 participants gave approximately 80% power to detect 20-percentage point superiority for PHMB 0.08% for the primary outcome of the medical cure rate (MCR; without surgery or change of AAT) within 12 months, cure defined by clinical criteria 90 days after discontinuing anti-inflammatory agents and AAT. A prespecified multivariable analysis adjusted for baseline imbalances in risk factors affecting outcomes.
Main Outcome Measures:
The main outcome measure was MCR within 12 months, with secondary outcomes including best-corrected visual acuity and treatment failure rates. Safety outcomes included adverse event rates.
Results:
One hundred thirty-five participants were randomized, providing 127 in the full-analysis subset (61 receiving PHMB 0.02%+ propamidine and 66 receiving PHMB 0.08%) and 134 in the safety analysis subset. The adjusted MCR within 12 months was 86.6% (unadjusted, 88.5%) for PHMB 0.02%+ propamidine and 86.7% (unadjusted, 84.9%) for PHMB 0.08%; the noninferiority requirement for PHMB 0.08% was met (adjusted difference, 0.1 percentage points; lower one-sided 95% confidence limit, -8.3 percentage points). Secondary outcomes were similar for both treatments and were not analyzed statistically: median best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and an overall treatment failure rate of 17 of 127 patients (13.4%), of whom 8 of 127 patients (6.3%) required therapeutic keratoplasty. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred.
Conclusions:
PHMB 0.08% monotherapy may be as effective (or at worse only 8 percentage points less effective) as dual therapy with PHMB 0.02%+ propamidine (a widely used therapy) with medical cure rates of more than 86%, when used with the trial treatment delivery protocol in populations with AK with similar disease severity.
Financial Disclosure(S):
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
