Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025

07:16
Resin-Assisted Capture Coupled with Isobaric Tandem Mass Tag Labeling for Multiplexed Quantification of Protein Thiol Oxidation
Published on: June 21, 2021
1.8K
Must protection, sulfites versus bioprotection: A metabolomic study
Manon Lebleux1, Hervé Alexandre1, Rémy Romanet1
1Laboratoire VAlMiS-IUVV, AgroSup Dijon, UMR PAM A 02.102, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France.
Food Research International (Ottawa, Ont.)
|October 7, 2023
Summary
Bioprotection using non-Saccharomyces yeasts is an alternative to sulfites in winemaking. While it alters wine’s chemical composition and antioxidant properties, it does not significantly impact sensory profiles.
Area of Science:
- Enology
- Wine Chemistry
- Microbiology
Background:
- Reducing chemical inputs like sulfites is a key challenge in the wine industry.
- Bioprotection using non-Saccharomyces yeasts offers an alternative to sulfites for preventing microbial spoilage.
- The impact of replacing sulfites with bioprotection on final wine characteristics requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the impact of substituting sulfites with bioprotection on Chardonnay wine.
- To compare the effects of sulfite treatment versus bioprotection on wine's physico-chemical and metabolic profiles.
- To provide insights into the consequences of sulfite reduction in winemaking.
Main Methods:
- An integrative approach was employed to analyze Chardonnay wine.
- Physico-chemical analyses were conducted to assess oenological parameters.
- Phenolic compound analysis and untargeted metabolomic analyses were performed.
- Sensory profiling was used to evaluate the impact on wine's organoleptic properties.
Main Results:
- Physico-chemical analyses showed no significant differences in classical oenological parameters between sulfite and bioprotection treatments.
- Bioprotection offered less protection against oxidation compared to sulfites, as indicated by phenolic compound analysis.
- Metabolomic analyses revealed substantial changes in wine composition, particularly in nitrogen-containing compounds and antioxidant compounds like glutathione and melatonin.
- Despite chemical differences, sensory profiles of wines were not significantly impacted by the must treatment.
Conclusions:
- Substituting sulfites with bioprotection significantly alters Chardonnay wine's chemical composition and antioxidant capacity.
- Bioprotection impacts yeast metabolism, affecting nitrogen-containing compounds and the production of key antioxidants.
- The study highlights that while chemical profiles change, the sensory experience of wine may remain consistent, offering valuable insights for sulfite reduction strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Sulfur Assimilation
21
Sulfur is an essential element in biological systems, contributing to synthesizing key biomolecules, including amino acids such as cysteine and methionine, and cofactors such as coenzyme A and biotin. Microorganisms primarily assimilate sulfur as sulfate (SO₄²⁻) from the environment, which must undergo a series of biochemical transformations before it can be incorporated into cellular components. As sulfate is highly oxidized, it must undergo assimilatory sulfate reduction to...
21
Preparation and Reactions of Sulfides
4.9K
Sulfides are the sulfur analog of ethers, just as thiols are the sulfur analog of alcohol. Like ethers, sulfides also consist of two hydrocarbon groups bonded to the central sulfur atom. Depending upon the type of groups present, sulfides can be symmetrical or asymmetrical. Symmetrical sulfides can be prepared via an SN2 reaction between 2 equivalents of an alkyl halide and one equivalent of sodium sulfide.
4.9K

