Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative Evaluation of Rituximab Versus Approved Therapies in Aquaporin-4-IgG-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Neurology and therapy·2026
Same author

Challenges and future directions for multiple sclerosis after the 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Patient-Reported Disability Measure and Self-Administered Neuroperformance Outcomes.

Annals of neurology·2026
Same author

Chronological ageing and ovarian reserve in MS: insights from anti-Müllerian hormone and disability progression.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same author

Redefining Multiple Sclerosis: Toward a Biologically Driven Diagnosis.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Spider-MS: an individualized polyhedral prediction of multiple sclerosis prognosis.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
04:25

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.5K

Global and Regional Deep Learning Models for Multiple Sclerosis Stratification From MRI.

Llucia Coll1, Deborah Pareto2, Pere Carbonell-Mirabent1

  • 1Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI
|October 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Deep learning models using anatomical MRI can predict multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis. A global brain approach demonstrated the best balance for stratifying MS patients by disability level in external validation.

Keywords:
classificationdeep learninginput samplingmultiple sclerosisstructural MRI

More Related Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

9.0K
Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images
06:48

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
04:25

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.5K
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

9.0K
Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images
06:48

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Prognosis

Background:

  • Anatomical MRI combined with deep learning (e.g., CNNs) shows promise for predicting multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis.
  • Lack of studies comparing different input strategies for these predictive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare whole-brain versus regional/specific-tissue input strategies for deep learning models.
  • To stratify MS patients based on disability level using MRI data.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study with 319 MS patients (in-house) and 440 MS patients (external validation).
  • 3D-CNN trained to classify patients by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (≥3.0 vs. <3.0).
  • Compared global (whole brain) and regional (white matter, gray matter, etc.) input strategies.

Main Results:

  • In-house: Gray matter regional model achieved 81% accuracy; global approach achieved 79%.
  • External validation: White matter model achieved 72% accuracy; global approach achieved 71%.
  • Global approach showed the best performance-to-generalization trade-off.

Conclusions:

  • The global approach provides a robust method for stratifying MS patients by disability using anatomical MRI and deep learning.
  • Input strategy choice impacts model performance in predicting MS prognosis.